About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

browse comments: WIPO RFC-1

WIPO RFC-1
osmith001@sprintmai.com
Fri, 10 Jul 1998 21:25:48 -0400

Browse by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: bentley@crenelle.com: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: marcmcswain@email.msn.com: "WIPO RFC-1"


From: osmith001@sprintmai.com
Subject: WIPO RFC-1

Attachment: http://wipo2.wipo.int/dns_attachments/attach900120348.doc

Dear Sirs: I suggest a conservative approach to regulating trademarks on the Internet. I assert that the national and international laws, treaties, and institutions that govern the regulation of trademarks off the Internet are capable of regulating with trademarks on the Internet. Though the Internet offers some revolutionary capabilities, with respect to trademark issues, the Internet really is not that much different than a billboard, television image, a movie, or a page of paper. Thus, the rules that govern these more traditional media will also work--perhaps with some modest alteration--on the Internet.

The essence of trademark law is that a person, who first uses a trademark to identify himself or his products or services to the public, may exclusively use that trademark to identify himself and market his goods to the public. And whenever any other subsequent user uses a trademark (Subsequent Trademark) sufficiently similar first user's trademark (First Trademark) to confuse the public as to the identity of the user of the trademark or the origin of goods or services, the use of the Subsequent Trademark is an infringement of the First trademark. These rules will work on the Internet as well as off the Internet, because policies and equities that inform them are true and wise regardless of the medium of expression.

The public has a right to know with whom they are dealing when they purchase goods or services or rely on representations. A person or juridical entity has a right to the benefit of its reputation, the value of its marketing efforts, and accumulated goodwill associated with its trademark. These intellectual property rights in a trademark and the public's right to know with whom it deals arise from the use of a trademark, and there is nothing about the Internet that alters or vitiates these rights. Therefore, the WIPO can and should apply existing trademark law to the Internet without modification, except where necessary to address some unique feature of the Internet.

Sincerely yours,
Orlando Smith, Esq.

 -- Posted automatically from Process Web site

Next message: bentley@crenelle.com: "WIPO RFC-1"
Previous message: marcmcswain@email.msn.com: "WIPO RFC-1"