About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Organizational Matters and Special Rules of Procedure of the Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS)

Adopted at the tenth session of the Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS), November 25, 2022

1. Subject to the following Organizational Matters and Special Rules of Procedure, the General Rules of Procedure of WIPO shall apply to the Committee on WIPO Standards (CWS).

2. The CWS shall report to the General Assembly of WIPO at least once every two years.

3. Recommendations and proposals from the CWS may be passed either to the WIPO General Assembly, to the Program and Budget Committee, or directly to the Director General, as needed.

4. The CWS shall establish its work program, priorities and working methods.

5. The decisions adopted by the CWS are considered as recommendations directed to Member States, in particular to their national or regional intellectual property offices, to the International Bureau of WIPO, to international organizations, and to any other national or international institutions interested in intellectual property matters.

6. The CWS may establish or dissolve task forces. Task forces will deal with specific tasks as required and be subject to the rules provided in paragraphs 23 to 29, below.

Membership

7. All WIPO Member States as well as Members of the Paris Union or Berne Union that are not Member States of WIPO shall be members of the CWS. In addition, the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO), the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP), the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), the European Patent Organization (EPO), the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV), the Nordic Patent Institute (NPI), the Patent Office of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC), Visegrad Patent Institute (VPI) and the European Union shall be members of the CWS, provided that they shall not have the right to vote.

8. Observer status is extended to Member States of the United Nations that are not Member States of WIPO, the Paris Union or Berne Union. The CWS determines which intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations shall be admitted to its meetings as observers. The Director General of WIPO shall invite, as observers, to the meetings of the CWS such entities that were admitted as observers by the CWS. Additionally, observers that were admitted by the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO, shall be invited by the Director General of WIPO, if the subject matter of the CWS meetings seems to be of direct interest to these observers.

Mandate

9. The mandate of the CWS will be to provide a forum to adopt new or revised WIPO standards, policies, recommendations and statements of principle relating to intellectual property data, global information system related matters, information services on the global system, data dissemination and documentation, which may be promulgated or referred to the WIPO General Assembly for consideration or approval.

10. The Secretariat will endeavor to provide technical advice and assistance for capacity building to IP Offices by undertaking projects regarding dissemination of IP standards information. The Secretariat will provide regular written reports to the CWS on the details of such activities, as well as any other technical assistance and capacity-building activities that it undertakes in connection with the mandate, and provide the same to the General Assembly. The Secretariat will provide funding assistance for the participation of LDCs and developing countries, within existing budgetary resources, in order to encourage and facilitate the participation of technical experts from developing countries and LDCs in CWS meetings.

Sessions

11. The CWS will meet once a year and will receive annual progress reports from its subsidiary bodies.

Officers

12. The CWS shall have a Chair and two Vice-Chairs and shall elect them for a term of two consecutive sessions. Any outgoing Chair or Vice-Chair may be immediately re elected to office for one more consecutive term only.

Meeting documentation

13. Meeting documentation shall be published on the website of WIPO. The letter of invitation and the draft agenda will be distributed by electronic means and published on the website of WIPO.

Project Task Initiation

14. Tasks shall be created by the CWS.

15. Consideration of a new proposal, subject or activity, including requests for the revision of existing WIPO Standards or the preparation of new standards, may be initiated by any member, observer, task force or by the International Bureau by submission of a written project brief to the Secretariat. The project brief should include a clear description of the problem or specific need to be addressed, and indicate how it was determined. The project brief should also provide the objectives of the task, options for solution and the expected benefits.

16. The Secretariat shall present the requests and project briefs received to the first available session of the CWS for consideration with some additional information such as cost estimates, resource requirements, risks, success factors and the implications of the task on the existing CWS tasks. The CWS shall determine whether each specific request falls within its mandate and how to proceed with that request. The CWS shall also decide the appropriate subsequent action, including whether there is a need for creating a task and a task force to handle the task.

17. On each request adopted as a task for inclusion in its work program, the CWS shall determine the corresponding task description and the priority to be given to the task, including, as far as possible, the proposed action(s) and time frame(s).

18. The CWS shall designate a leader or co-leaders of the task force. If the task should not be assigned to a specific task force, the CWS shall assign a leader for the task. If the incumbent task force leaders inform the Secretariat of their resignation, the Secretariat shall report it to the first available session of the CWS.

Working methods

19. The CWS and, in particular, its task forces shall base their working methods on the intensive use of electronic means set up by the Secretariat. This ensures the flexibility required to allow a maximum number of interested members and observers worldwide to take part in the discussions and consider issues within a short period of time.

20. The authority for approving the creation of new WIPO Standards or for the revision of existing WIPO Standards shall belong to the CWS. The CWS may, however, establish a mechanism for reaching an agreement by electronic means, which may be delegated to its task forces as required. The CWS may also consider exceptionally to provide the authority to a designated task force to make use of the “fast track” procedure for the approval of the revisions of specific WIPO Standards, which require continuous revisions and updates. The “fast track” procedure is defined as follows:

  • (a) any proposal to revise the relevant WIPO Standard shall be presented directly or through the Secretariat to the designated Task Force for consideration and approval;
  • (b) the designated Task Force is temporarily authorized to approve revisions of the relevant WIPO Standard;
  • (c) if there is no consensus reached on the revisions by the designated Task Force, then it shall be presented to the CWS for its consideration; and
  • (d) the designated Task Force Leader will inform the CWS of any revision of the relevant WIPO Standard approved by the Task Force at the next session of the CWS.

21. A Chair’s summary shall be distributed to participants at the end of each session of the CWS. It will only refer to the decisions made by the CWS and the status of tasks. A detailed report of the session of the CWS shall be posted on the WIPO website for comments after closing the session. The adoption of the detailed report may take place through electronic means. If it should not be possible to reach an agreement on the detailed report via the electronic means, then the adoption of the said report shall be included in the agenda of the next session of the CWS.

22. The detailed report of a CWS session will reflect only the conclusions of the CWS (decisions, recommendations, opinions, etc.) and will not, in particular, reflect statements attributed to any participant, except where a reservation in relation to any specific conclusion of the CWS is expressed or repeated after the conclusion is reached.

Task forces

23. To allow for consideration of a specific issue, a task force shall be constituted on the following basis:

      • (a) a request for the creation of a task force may be initiated either by a member, by observers or by the International Bureau;
      • (b) a clear mandate for the task force must be agreed by the CWS in advance of the task force’s first discussions; such a document shall include:
        • the task(s) to be handled by the task force;
        • the designation of a task force leader;
        • an indication of the professional/technical competencies needed by delegates participating in the task force discussions; and
      • (c) task forces shall report to the CWS.

24. The Secretariat shall set up and maintain an e-forum for each task force, and provide the task force leader with assistance to carry out the work of the task force.

25. The Secretariat shall invite members and observers of the CWS to nominate their representatives to participate in the work of the task force, and shall particularly indicate the professional/technical competencies required. Members and observers should inform the Secretariat of the status of their representatives as soon as their representatives to the task force have been changed so that the membership of the task force is up to date.

26. The status of observer in a task force e-forum may be granted to external contractors of an intellectual property office if the request comes directly from a member.

27. Task forces should carry out their work in a dynamic and flexible environment and transparent manner. Electronic working via e-forums shall be their normal framework, but they may also hold meetings in person or remotely as needed. The information discussed and the work done by a task force at a meeting shall be posted on the e-forum in order to allow task force members and observers who could not attend the meeting to express their views. Substantive discussions and decisions relevant for the work of the task force shall be conducted within the task force.

28. The task force leader shall be responsible for initiating and conducting the task force discussions, making sure the views of all task force members are heard and duly discussed, reporting to the CWS on the agreements reached by the task force and presenting, through the Secretariat, the corresponding proposals for consideration by the CWS. If required, in consultation with the task force leader, the Secretariat may conduct discussion of the task force and/or report the task force’s activities to the CWS on behalf of the task force leader.

29. The CWS shall consider, revise, and take appropriate decisions on the recommendations of a task force, or refer the recommendation back to the task force for further consideration.