About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Takeaways from the WIPO Chief Economist's Network Meeting

Each year, the WIPO Chief Economist’s Network convenes to exchange insights, tools, and methodologies with IP offices worldwide. Here are some key highlights from this year’s meeting!

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes
Image: monkeybusinessimages/Getty

The WIPO Chief Economist’s Network has grown steadily, bringing together members from diverse countries, all committed to promoting evidence-based decision-making in intellectual property (IP). The network fosters global collaboration and invites all IP offices with economic research capacities to join. Its primary goal: to share knowledge that enhances the global impact of IP.

Key takeaways

A review of contributions from the WIPO Chief Economist’s Network members reveals two major themes: the role of IP in driving innovation and economic growth, and the growing importance of data-driven research in shaping evidence-based policies.

1. Intellectual property is a driver of innovation and economic growth

Countries like Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, and the European Patent Office (EPO) highlighted how IP fosters innovation, boosts firm competitiveness, and fuels economic growth.

  • Canada demonstrated how IP drives firm performance by expanding markets, encouraging R&D, and accelerating innovation—especially in fields like quantum and clean technologies. This focus aligns with Canada’s research agenda on the economic benefits of patenting.
  • France reported on the role of SMEs in patent filings, emphasizing how IP drives regional innovation. Its upcoming study (2019-2023) will shed light on the contribution of SMEs and mid-sized companies to innovation through patenting.
  • Singapore linked IP to sustainability goals and firm performance, showing how IP supports broader economic and environmental objectives. The country’s use of IP to shape policy illustrates the connection between strong IP frameworks and national development.
  • Switzerland is active in the field of new technologies and their influence on the IP system and publishes various studies on blockchain and IP as well as artificial intelligence and IP.
  • The EPO emphasized IP’s role in cleantech innovation and startups. Its collaboration with the European Investment Bank on financing challenges underscores the potential of IP rights to drive growth, especially in clean technologies critical to Europe’s competitiveness.

Across all cases, IP is viewed not just as a legal tool but as a core component of national growth strategies. This shared understanding highlights IP's transformative potential in translating innovation into economic success.

2. Data-driven research shapes evidence-based ip policy

Another key theme was the growing reliance on data and research to inform IP policy and improve system efficiency.

  • Australia conducted comprehensive studies on its innovation ecosystem, examining SMEs, labor mobility, patents for computer-related inventions, and patent grant timing. These studies highlight the need for data to understand patent system impacts.
  • Austria explored why IP is underutilized as a financial asset for startups and SMEs, partly due to restrictive accounting rules. The Austrian Patent Office released a report highlighting IP’s potential for financing and proposed steps to increase awareness of its benefits.
  • Brazil showcased its strategic intelligence platforms, such as INPI Data and the newly launched Brazil Innovation and Development Index. Brazil’s data-driven pricing policy shows how it optimizes its IP system for technological advancement.
  • The United States Copyright Office provides tools and data to support independent research on copyright, alongside its own studies on AI, demographics, and creative industries. This commitment to transparency emphasizes the role of research in shaping policies that support creators and the broader economy.

These IP offices are committed to evidence-based decision-making by systematically collecting and analyzing IP data. This research culture ensures that their IP policies stay relevant, adaptable, and responsive to global challenges.

Resources

Find below resources from these and other IP offices of the network.

Related Stories

The Importance of Making Connections

Just as people benefit from making connections in social and working environments, hotspots cross international borders to seek partners for innovation. Making these connections and choosing the right partners is increasingly important.

The Singaporean Recipe for Development

Singapore’s policymakers have played a significant role in helping the state transition into a high-income economy in less than forty years. Learn about which policies proved to be the most effective!

Related publications

Making innovation policy work for development

How do economies diversify? Drawing on original analysis of scientific, technological and export data, the World Intellectual Property Report 2024 shows how countries can promote innovation, economic development and sustainability by developing new innovative capabilities.