About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Innovation Gender Gap: Japan's Effort to Leave No One Behind

Asia’s rapid economic growth is well documented throughout the years. Despite this strong growth, female inventors seem to be left behind. Read on to find out how Japan is trying to address this innovation gender gap.

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

In her presentation at WIPO’s Online Seminar Series on the IP Gender Gap in the Asia-Pacific Region, Dr. Miyoko Watanabe, Standing Trustee at Nihon University and Chair of Committee on gender-based innovation in the Science Council of Japan, described the importance of women’s participation for intellectual property.

Why should we promote gender equality and womens’ participation in innovation and science and technology?

Video of Dr. Miyoko Watanabe’s presentation
Dr. Watanabe’s presentation during the Online Seminar on the Intellectual Property Gender and Diversity Gaps in the Asia-Pacific Region: Panel II

Most patents across the fifteen technological fields are overwhelmingly generated by male-only gendered teams. Even in the fields where the share of women scientists are almost on par with men, the male-only teams still generate more than a third of the inventions.

Why should we promote women participation?

Beyond the natural fairness argument according to which women deserve to participate as much as men, and the loss of potential by not exploiting the full inventive workforce capacity, Ms. Miyoko reports that adding women inventors can increase the economic value of inventions. Indeed, the Development Bank of Japan conducted studies showing that in engineering the economic value of inventions stemming from Japanese mixed-gender teams is 50% higher than male only teams.

gender-equality-japan-845

What is Asia’s current situation?

The Asian region overall performance on gender equality tracked by the Sustainable Development Goals index shows that gender equality is one of the region’s greatest weaknesses. Japan, in particular, is one of the only three OECD countries that still faces major challenges on this topic.

Moreover, there are biases that affect Asian women globally that impact their participation in innovative activities, such as:

  • Selection biases by venture capital decision makers, who are more likely to select white male entrepreneurs than women entrepreneurs and/or entrepreneurs from other racial groups.
  • Machine learning biases in translation and facial recognition, which make identifying Asian women more difficult.

The trend of women's participation in science

The ratio of Japanese female researchers has been increasing regularly over the last 20 years. However, the pace of this increase is too slow. It would take more than 35 additional years to reach a rate of 30 percent of women among researchers in Japan.

In addition, when analyzing the same ratio for different fields, the results show that female participation in engineering and natural sciences is dramatically lower than nursing and home economics.

What is Japan doing to address this trend?

Japan Science and Technology Agency has established organizations to award prizes to female researchers to promote them. These prizes are:

  • the Jun Ashida Awards directed towards researchers under 40 years old in any scientific field, and
  • the Marie Curie Awards for early-career researchers in science and technology.

In 2022, the University of Tokyo implemented a plan for gender equality, with a 5-year target, in which:

  • the participation of female professors and associate professors rises from 16% to 25%, and
  • the ratio of female students grows from the current 20% to 30% in 2027.

Related stories

In Canada, 1 in 8 AI Inventors is a Woman

There are several ways to get innovation and IP data with gender breakdown. Check which one suits your case better.

gender-gap-uk-845

Analyzing the U.K.’s leaky pipeline

The term “leaky pipeline” refers to the progressive reduction in women’s participation at the different stages of the career progression in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields. In many instances, this gap is most prominent at the inventor level. How can we measure how “leaky” is the “pipeline”? See how the UKIPO researchers measured the gender gap in patent data, and find out what they found in their investigation.

Related resources

Guidelines for producing gender analysis from innovation and IP data

Understanding how women and men can access and use the intellectual property (IP) system equally is key to ensuring that their ingenuity and creativity translates into economic, social and cultural development. This short guide summarizes best practice for producing innovation and IP gender indicators.