The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center has administered some 650 mediation, arbitration and expert determination (together, WIPO ADR) cases. As the table covering the period 2009-2018 shows, most of these cases were filed in recent years.
WIPO ADR cases were predominately based on contract clauses; however some cases were submitted to WIPO ADR as a result of a submission agreement concluded after the dispute had arisen (some of these following WIPO Good Offices as described below, including disputes pending before national courts).
Some 40% of the mediation, arbitration and expedited arbitration cases filed with the WIPO Center included an escalation clause providing for WIPO mediation followed, in the absence of a settlement, by WIPO arbitration or expedited arbitration.
In addition, the WIPO Center regularly provides procedural guidance to parties in order to facilitate their direct settlement, or the submission of their existing dispute to WIPO ADR.
The WIPO Center has assisted parties in over 500 "Good Offices" requests (some of these are followed by WIPO ADR proceedings) based in different jurisdictions from all regions of the world.
WIPO ADR cases usually arise in the context of the following types of disputes:
Parties to WIPO ADR cases include large-sized companies, SMEs and startups across industries and sectors, artists and inventors, R&D centers, universities, producers and collecting societies.
Parties to WIPO ADR cases so far were based in different jurisdictions, including: Algeria, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Belize, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lebanon, North Macedonia, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and United States of America and Zambia.
The most common venues of WIPO ADR proceedings have included: France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America.
WIPO ADR proceedings have been conducted in several languages, such as: Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Korean, Portuguese and Spanish.
Amounts in dispute in WIPO ADR cases have varied from USD 15,000 to 1 billion.
The remedies claimed in arbitration proceedings have included: damages, infringement declarations and specific performance, such as a declaration of non-performance of contractual obligations, or of infringement of rights, further safeguards for the preservation of confidentiality of evidence, the provision of a security, the production of data, the delivery of goods and the conclusion of new contracts.
WIPO has administered some 43,000 cases under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and related policies. Together, these proceedings have involved parties from 179 countries and some 79,000 Internet domain names. The WIPO Center provides a full range of statistics concerning WIPO domain name cases (e.g., case outcomes and languages, complainant industries, and geographical distribution of parties) on its website. Frequently asked questions on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as it relates to the UDRP, and the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition are also available online.
The UDRP applies primarily to international domains such as .com, .net, .org, .top, .win and .xyz. In addition, over 70 country code top-level domains (ccTLDs) have appointed the WIPO Center as service provider for managing domain name disputes in their respective ccTLD. The WIPO Center has published expansive web pages for its ccTLD services. Apart from UDRP cases the WIPO Center has administered over 15,000 cases under Sunrise policies relating to registrations in the start-up phase of new domains, as well as 69 cases filed under the ICANN Legal Rights Objection (LRO) mechanism for new gTLDs.