About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO ADR for Artificial Intelligence (AI) Disputes

In a rapidly evolving landscape driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, IP-related disputes are becoming more common. As AI, including Generative AI, increasingly integrates into diverse industries, questions regarding the ownership, licensing, and infringement of AI-generated content and innovations arise. WIPO Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Services offer a structured framework to address these AI-related disputes, providing a compelling alternative to traditional court litigation.

For more information, you can contact us by:

email
book an online appointment with us
doc
(PHOTO: Vertigo3d/GettyImages)

Understanding AI Disputes through WIPO case examples



A dispute between an online music dataset provider and an online platform over the unauthorized use of the dataset for training the platform’s AI tool. The dataset owner alleges that their copyrighted content was used without permission or awareness for commercial purposes, infringing copyright.


A dispute over the incorporation of a book into a Generative AI platform and the subsequent claim that the resulting output was an original creation.

A dispute arose between an AI-generated music technology company and an online service provider relating to IP infringement (including copyright, trade secrets and patents). The AI technology company alleged that the online provider unlawfully reverse-engineered and commercially exploited its AI-generated music technology without authorization. Following an invitation to mediate and direct communications between the parties facilitated by the WIPO AMC, the parties agreed to the removal of the infringing content and the matter was resolved within two weeks.

Go back to menu

Key Areas of Dispute

Go back to menu

Potential Parties to AI-related Disputes

  • academics
  • AI service providers
  • artists
  • Collective Management Organizations (CMOs)
  • consumers
  • creators
  • data providers
  • developers and innovators
  • end users
Go back to menu

Administration of AI-related Disputes

The WIPO Mediation, (Expedited) Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules are well suited for AI-related disputes. The WIPO Rules are designed for disputes related to both intellectual property and technology. All WIPO Rules have confidentiality provisions, including provisions for trade secrets.

The WIPO Center provides guidance on the appropriate ADR procedures, namely on the WIPO Rules, applicable fees, use of ADR clauses, and related administrative services (for example, by providing administration tools, video conferencing, and document management).

In its role as administering institution, the WIPO Center maintains strict neutrality and independence.

Go back to menu

WIPO Open-ended List of Experts

Effective ADR proceedings depend on the quality of the mediator, arbitrator, or expert. The WIPO Center maintains a global list of experts, including in the field of IP and AI. This enables parties to select professionals with the requisite technical knowledge. In cases conducted under the WIPO Rules, parties retain the flexibility to appoint experts from this list or from outside it.

Go back to menu

Procedural Guidance and Training

The WIPO Center makes available recommended contract clauses and submission agreements that parties can use to submit their disputes to ADR. Upon request, the WIPO Center provides procedural guidance, aids in drafting ADR clauses in AI-related contracts and assists parties in bringing cases to WIPO ADR. The WIPO Center also organizes training and workshops on mediation, arbitration, and related topics.

Go back to menu

Collaborative approach

The WIPO Center collaborates with stakeholders in the AI industry through initiatives such as WIPO's Intellectual Property and Frontier Technologies to develop effective ADR procedures that prioritize efficient dispute resolution while preserving business relationships. Open to cooperation with interested parties, WIPO continually enhances its services to meet the evolving needs of AI stakeholders.

Go back to menu

Contact Us

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (Geneva)
34, chemin des Colombettes
1211 Geneva 20
Switzerland

T +4122 338 8247
F +4122 740 370

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (Singapore)
Maxwell Chambers Suites
28 Maxwell Road #02-14
Singapore 069120

T +65 6225 2129
F +65 6225 3568

For additional information arbiter.mail@wipo.int

https://www3.wipo.int/contact/en/area.jsp?area=arbitration https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/disclaim.html https://www.wipo.int/en/web/privacy-policy/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/accessibility/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/sitemap.html https://www3.wipo.int/newsletters/en/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/podcasts/ https://www.wipo.int/news/en/