About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

General Information on RDRP

This page is merely provided as a matter of historical record.

General Information on .biz

Complaints under the RDRP (Restrictions Dispute Resolution Policy)

Filing an RDRP Complaint

Filing an RDRP Response

Filing a combined RDRP/UDRP Complaint

Filing a combined RDRP/UDRP Response

Complaints under the UDRP (Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy)

Cases under STOP (Start-up Trademark Opposition Policy)


 

General Information on the RDRP

The Restrictions Dispute Resolution Policy for .BIZ (RDRP) is exclusive to the .BIZ gTLD. The RDRP is used to resolve disputes between domain name registrants and third parties asserting that the disputed domain name was registered in violation of the .BIZ Registration Restrictions. The RDRP is incorporated into all .BIZ Registration Agreements.

In an RDRP complaint, the Complainant must demonstrate that the disputed domain name "is not being or will not be used primarily for a bona fide business or commercial purpose" (RDRP, para. 4(a)). RDRP, Paragraph 4(b) identifies examples of circumstances that constitute "bona fide business or commercial use". RDRP, Paragraph 4(c) sets out examples of purposes that do not constitute a "bona fide business or commercial use".

RDRP Complaints can either be brought alone or in combination with a UDRP Complaint. Thus, a Complainant can either base its Complaint on the RDRP criteria alone, or can assert both RDRP and UDRP criteria in one Complaint. The Center has prepared Model Complaint and Response Forms for single RDRP as well as for combined RDRP/UDRP disputes.

Single RDRP Complaints can be filed by any person or entity. In combined RDRP/UDRP Complaints, the Complainant must prove all UDRP criteria (including trademark ownership) in addition to the RDRP criteria.

The procedure for single RDRP as well as for combined RDRP/UDRP proceedings is the same as under the UDRP. The NeuLevel Supplemental Rules for Restrictions Dispute Resolution Policy for .BIZ (Supplemental RDRP Rules) refer, in Paragraph 1, to the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP Rules).

Administrative proceedings under the RDRP, as well as combined RDRP/UDRP proceedings, are subject to the WIPO Supplemental UDRP Rules and to theUDRP Schedule of Fees. There is no special Schedule of Fees for single RDRP or combined RDRP/UDRP proceedings.

RDRP proceedings are subject to the following provisions:

In addition to the above, combined RDRP/UDRP proceedings are also subject to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.