About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO Domain Name Panelists

To conduct UDRP and ccTLD cases, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center has established a Roster of Panelists who have agreed to serve on WIPO Domain Name Administrative Panels. WIPO panelists come from all regions of the world and are relied on for their impartiality, sound judgement, and experience as decision-makers, as well as their expertise with trademarks and domain names.

The WIPO Center’s panel appointment considerations are informed by a range of legally and ethically responsible factors, including: panel language capability, party and panel nationality, geographic diversity, gender balance, panel availability, and panel experience.

Before appointing a panelist, in each case the WIPO Center confirms with each prospective panelist whether there are any facts or circumstances which might reasonably call into question that prospective panelist’s independence. In this respect, accepted norms such as the International Bar Association (IBA) Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration are taken into account. WIPO requires all prospective panelists to complete and submit a Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence.

The WIPO Center also considers the continuing education of panelists in terms of case practice and jurisprudence to be of utmost importance to ensure WIPO panelists maintain their subject matter expertise in the continually evolving environments of trademark and domain name disputes. WIPO panelists are expected to be proactive in making sure they are up-to-date with domain name dispute resolution jurisprudence. WIPO panelists maintain such subject matter expertise e.g., by attending events such as WIPO Panelists Meetings or the WIPO Advanced Workshop on Domain Name Dispute Resolution, to engage in discussions on the legal trends and case developments amongst colleagues and leading experts.