Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF v. Assane Amadou,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of a generic top level domain to the disputed domain name does not constitute an element so as to avoid confusing similarity for purposes of the Policy.
...
2015-07-08 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre. Assane Amadou,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714). Therefore the addition of descriptive wording to a trademark, in this case the misspelled phrase “rent a car”, is insufficient in itself to avoid finding of a confusing similarity.
...
2015-10-28 - Case Details
D2000-0859; Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Mariana Gemenitzi, supra; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited. / PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-12-13 - Case Details
The absence of rights or legitimate interests is generally established if a complainant makes out a prima facie case and the respondent enters no response. Id., (citing De Agostini S.p.A. v. Marco Cialone,
WIPO Case No. DTV2002-0005).
Complainant avers that Respondents are not commonly known by the disputed domain name, and that their use of the name is not authorized by Complainant. ...Therefore, the Panel concludes that Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith. Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français - SNCF v. Damian Miller / Miller Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0891.
...
2013-08-20 - Case Details
Why else would someone register a domain name and then allow it to be used to direct to commercial web sites, including the Complainant's? (see for example Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627 where the panel stated that use of the disputed domain to connect to commercial websites was a bad faith offering of goods and services; and Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...See HRB Innovations Inc., Express Tax Service Inc. v. Calvin Brown,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1072; Société des Produits Nestlé SA v. Wolf Internet Services LDC, Wolfgang Sauer,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1626; Ideal Products, LLC v. ...
2009-08-26 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF contre Assane Amadoun,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
Thirdly, this Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of the gTLD “.com” to the disputed domain name does not constitute an element so as to avoid confusing similarity for purposes of the Policy.
...
2015-03-17 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2013-12-06 - Case Details
Unasi, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0556; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. Miguel Casajuana,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1593; and Red Bull GmbH. v. ...
2012-12-04 - Case Details
Geocaching Zero,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-08-12 - Case Details
Several UDRP panels concurred that “[…] the use of a domain name to point to a website that offers sponsored links to other websites providing services or goods which are similar to those offered by a complainant’s own website is evidence of bad faith” (See Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited./PrivacyProtect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-12-01 - Case Details
Kaththea Sias,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1665; and Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais v. Sinclare Vabalon, BHG,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1613.
(ii) Rights or Legitimate Interests
Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the term “bwin” and that there are no international or Community Trademark Marks, names or other rights that would justify a legal interest in Respondent's use of the disputed domain names. ...The absence of rights or legitimate interests is established if Complainant makes out a prima facie case and Respondent enters no response. See id., (citing De Agostini S.p.A. v. Marco Cialone,
WIPO Case No. DTV2002-0005).
Complainant alleges that Respondent does not have legitimate interests because Respondent does not have registered trademark or name rights in the term “bwin,” and that Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain names. ...
2009-04-14 - Case Details
It further submits that the adjunction of the common English generic term “solar” is insufficient to give any distinctiveness to the disputed domain name; see Socété des Participations du Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomique v. David Morton, supra and Forlula One Licensing B.V. v. ...Jose Gregorio Hernandez Quintero,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1050; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627 and Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...
2010-09-30 - Case Details
Jameela Seif,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français SNCF v. Assane Amadou,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0714).
This Panel finds that the addition of merely generic and descriptive wording to a trademark, in this case the word “casino”, is insufficient in itself to avoid a finding of confusing similarity. ...
2015-09-15 - Case Details
TLD’s are generally ignored for purposes of determining confusing similarity, because they are necessary to any domain name, they are generic and they fail to distinguish the domain name from the trademark. See Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais, SNCF v. Transure Enterprise Ltd / Bargain Register Domain Privacy, WIPO Case. ...The Pentium Group,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0273; TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V. v. Spiral Matrix,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0008.
Based on Respondent’s offer to sell Complainant the Doman Name in an amount well in excess of what could reasonably be assumed to be Respondent’s out-of-pocket costs and the facts and circumstances of passive holding described above, the Panel considers that Respondent both registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith. ...
2014-02-21 - Case Details
In this context, the Complainant cites Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais (SNCF) v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited./PrivacyProtect,
WIPO Case No. ...In addition, the “.info” suffix in the disputed domain name does not affect the determination that the disputed domain name is nearly identical with WEBCRAWLER in which the Complainant has trademark rights (see also: Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Trending,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0484; Köstrizer Schwarzbierbrauerei v. Macros-Telekom Corp.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-10-03 - Case Details
El 9 de noviembre de 2023 el Demandado presentó una solicitud de registro para la marca HUVITZ en
Colombia, denegada de oficio el 28 de junio de 2024 por la existencia previa de las solicitudes de marcas
HUVITZ de la Demandante, como consecuencia de la Alerta de Irregistrabilidad presentada por la
Demandante ante la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio colombiana el 30 de abril de 2024.
...En la medida en que dichos principios puedan entrar en una aparente contradicción, el
Experto considera necesario ponderar las circunstancias a la hora de tomar una decisión al respecto.
El Experto nota que el nombre de dominio en disputa fue registrado en 2014 (sin perjuicio de que el nombre
de dominio en disputa hubiera pasado a estar a nombre de Jose Luis Vargas posteriormente) y que la
Demanda ha sido presentada en 2025, y considera que la oposición de la Demandante a la extensión del
plazo parece apoyarse más en un tecnicismo que en un agravamiento del supuesto perjuicio que se pudiera
derivar de la extensión del plazo para la presentación del escrito de contestación (véase SNCF - Société
Nationale des Chemins de fer Français v. ...
2025-05-22 - Case Details
The Complainant alleges that the use to which the Disputed Domain Name has been put “does not represent a use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services” (see: Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. ostrid company, Domains by Proxy, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0627; Educational Testing Service (ETS) v. ...
2011-11-11 - Case Details
Kaththea Sias,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1665; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais v. Sinclare Vabalon, BHG,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1613; Florida Department of Management Services v. ...
2011-09-22 - Case Details
Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-0666; Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français v. RareNames, Inc., RareNames WebReg and RN WebReg,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1849; St Andrews Links Ltd v. ...
2014-05-01 - Case Details
PrivacyProtect.org and Maying Joe, supra (finding to be confusingly similar to the VALERO mark, stating that “The addition of the words ‘gas station’ to ‘valero’ in the disputed domain name mitigates in favor of confusing similarity, particularly since such generic words directly point to the Complainant’s business.”); and Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français, SNCF v. Transure Enterprise Ltd / Above.com Domain Privacy,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-02-17 - Case Details