About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.045 sec)

Rows

<<  <  101 - 120  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0707 for legoparkstadstadion.com, preschoollego.com html (21 KB)

Mr. Knudstorp, who is the president of Lego, expects that Lego will be the market leader by 2020. Lego has been present in China for 15 years. Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the Lego Group of Companies or the Lego Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...

2010-07-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0917 for lego-games-boost.com html (12 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Narong Sangaed Case No. D2013-0917 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Sweden, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant is the registered owner of the trademark LEGO in numerous countries. A list of the LEGO trademark registrations of the Complainant is attached to the Complaint. ...

2013-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1643 for lego-33.com, lego-33.site, lego-baru.com, lego-bos.com, lego-jitu.site, lego-kilat.com, lego-king.com, lego-mega.com, lego-senang.com, lego-super.com, lego-ultra.com, lego-wp.site, lego33-pusat.info, lego33-spin.live, lego33-star.com, lego33-tip.site, lego33.asia ... pdf (176 KB)

<lego-king.com> Name.com, Inc. <lego-mega.com> Name.com, Inc. <lego-senang.com> Name.com, Inc. <lego-super.com> Name.com, Inc. ...Decision For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain names <lego-baru.com>, <lego-bos.com>, <lego-jitu.site>, <lego-kilat.com>, <lego-king.com>, <lego-mega.com>, <lego-senang.com>, <lego-super.com>, , <lego-ultra.com>, <lego-wp.site>, , , <lego-33.com>, , , , , , , , , , <lego-33.site>, , , , , , , , , , , , be transferred to the Complainant. ...

2024-08-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0160 for legofanatic.net html (22 KB)

D2009-0381; LEGO Juris A/S v. Zhijun Guo, WIPO Case No. D2009-0184; LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises, WIPO Case No. D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer, WIPO Case No. D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. ...

2010-04-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1217 for lego-starwars.xyz html (20 KB)

Additionally, the Complainant owns thousands of domain names containing the word “lego” where most of them put the word “lego” at the beginning such as <lego-agent.info>, <lego-star-wars.com> and nearly 4,300 domain names including the ones containing the word “starwars” following the word “lego”...(2) The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark and the domain names containing the word “lego” such as <lego-star-wars.net>, <lego-starwars.de>, <lego-starwors.de> and <lego-starwarsshop.com>...

2015-09-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-0548 for legomug.com html (20 KB)

LEGO Juris A/S v. Kiana Seyfi, Lego, WIPO Case No. D2016-1166; LEGO Juris A/S v. shilei, WIPO Case No. D2016-0152; LEGO Juris A/S v. Park KyeongSook, WIPO Case No. D2016-1195; LEGO Juris A/S v. Viktor Tkachev, Lego Town, WIPO Case No. ...

2017-05-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0835 for legotable.org html (19 KB)

Factual Background Complainant in these proceedings is LEGO Juris A/S, a leading company in the field of children’s toys and games (“LEGO”). According to the non-contested allegations provided by Complainant, Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks in the LEGO family of marks in a number of jurisdictions around the world (collectively, the “LEGO Marks”). ...See Lego Juris A/S v. Synergy Management, Fred Shear, WIPO Case No. D2007-1028. Over the years, LEGO has devoted substantial resources and efforts to building goodwill in LEGO Marks, which are used in connection with the sale of LEGO’s products throughout the world. ...

2011-07-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DIR2014-0010 for legoweb.ir html (19 KB)

Indeed, the LEGO trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous. The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...See LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp, WIPO Case No. D2008-1692, LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPOCase No. ...

2015-03-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0995 for legolandje.com html (18 KB)

The LEGO group has expanded use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...Rampe Purda, WIPO Case No. 2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator, WIPO Case No. 2010-1260 (“In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”); and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2012-07-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2519 for legosneakers.com pdf (163 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. David Case No. D2023-2519 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...D2008-1715, where the panel recognized that LEGO is a well-known and distinctive trademark; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr., WIPO Case No. ...

2023-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0152 for legowolds.com, legowords.com, wwwlegoworlds.com html (18 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant (based in Denmark) is the owner of the LEGO brand, and all other trade marks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO-branded products. ...D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-04-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2134 for legosneygr.com pdf (149 KB)

The menu bar formerly displayed tabs with labels including LEGO City, LEGO Classic, LEGO Technic, and LEGO Disney. The LEGO logo is displayed in a product image. ...As regards registration, the disputed domain name was registered in 2022, decades after the registration of the Complainant’s LEGO trademarks, including in China where the Respondent is based. The disputed domain name wholly incorporates the LEGO mark as its initial element and resolves to a website that displays the LEGO mark, the LEGO logo, names of the Complainant’s product ranges (such as LEGO City and LEGO Classic), and images of the Complainant’s toys. ...

2023-07-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-5243 for legobatcave.store pdf (145 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. SABRINA HOPKINS Case No. D2024-5243 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...To the contrary, the disputed domain name at some point resolved to a website at “www.legobatcave.store” set up in the English language, which offered LEGO products from Complainant’s LEGO BATCAVE series of toys for online sale without any authorization by Complainant to do so, thereby prominently displaying Complainant’s official LEGO logo. ...

2025-02-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DRO2011-0010 for jucarii-lego.ro html (13 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is persuaded that the LEGO group is the holder of the famous trademark LEGO. The LEGO group has rights in the trademark LEGO for construction toys and other LEGO branded products though registration all over the world but also through extensive, exclusive and continuous use for more than a half of century. ...

2011-11-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1267 for legostarwars3.org html (12 KB)

Knudstorp who is the president of LEGO expects that LEGO will be the market leader by 2020. LEGO has been present in China for 15 years. ...The LEGO Group also maintains an extensive website under the domain names and . The LEGO Group has a license agreement with Lucasfilm Ltd. concerning the use of the trademark STAR WARS incorporated in the LEGO product line. ...

2011-09-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1001 for educationlego.com html (13 KB)

The Complainant is based in Denmark (Annex 7 of Complaint) is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. By way of example, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2012, was almost USD 2.9 Billion. ...

2014-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2187 for legoshop.top html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Torsten Kruger Case No. D2017-2187 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including Germany. The Complainant also owns close to 5,000 domain names incorporating the term "lego". ...

2018-02-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-3963 for legomysterybox.com pdf (146 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. Mystery Lego, Lego Mystery Box Case No. D2025-3963 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...case=D2006-1095 ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. Mystery Lego, Lego Mystery Box Case No. D2025-3963 1. The Parties 2. The Domain Name and Registrar 3. ...

2025-11-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1669 for legosmeister.com html (13 KB)

The language of the proceedings is English in accordance with paragraph 11(a) of the Rules. 4. Factual Background The Complainant LEGO Juris A/S, based in Denmark, is the owner of the well-known LEGO trademark and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...See LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda, WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. ...

2012-10-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0065 for legoonline.top, legotoystore.top html (15 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant is part of the LEGO Group and has its historical headquarters in Denmark. The LEGO Group has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world. ...Furthermore, the case file shows that the disputed domain names were used to create and operate commercial websites using the LEGO logo, reproducing the famous LEGO figurines without authorization, and purportedly offering the LEGO products for sale. ...

2021-03-25 - Case Details