Since 2008, transfer has been ordered against Respondent in
hundreds of other UDRP proceedings filed with the Center. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Above.com
Domain Privacy/ Host Master, Transure Enterprise Ltd, WIPO Case No. D2012-0377; Association des
Centres Distributeurs, E. ...
2023-06-27 - Case Details
UDRP panels found in previous decisions that in the absence of any license or permission from the
Complainant to use widely known trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of a disputed domain name
may reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris NS v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy,
Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WPO Case No. ...
2023-07-21 - Case Details
DBR2013-0010; Globex Utilidades S/A (Globex) e Nova Pontocom Comércio Eletrônico S/A (Nova Pontocom) v. André Ribeiro,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2012-0012; Lego System A/S v. Omar Quadros Motta,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2014-0001; e Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras v. ...
2016-10-31 - Case Details
In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. Devin Steenberg,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0394; QVC Inc. and ER Marks Inc. v. WhoisGuard,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-10-10 - Case Details
D2001-0259; SWATCH AG v. Stefano Manfroi,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0802; LEGO Juris A/S v. F.H.U. Betternet Rafal Biegun,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0939; Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. PrivacyProtect.org / LAKSH INTERNET SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-11-06 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have ruled that gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark (see Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-28 - Case Details
In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. Devin Steenberg,
WIPO Case No. D2015-0394; QVC Inc. and ER Marks Inc. v. WhoisGuard,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-22 - Case Details
It contends that the registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar to a well known mark is an act of bad faith in itself. In support of that contention it refers to LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-03-10 - Case Details
DBR2013-0010; Globex Utilidades S/A (Globex) e Nova Pontocom Comércio Eletrônico S/A (Nova Pontocom) v. André Ribeiro,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2012-0012; e Lego System A/S v. Omar Quadros Motta,
Caso OMPI No. DBR2014-0001.
2 De acordo com o art. 22 do Regulamento, o NIC.br procederá à implementação desta decisão no décimo quinto dia útil após o recebimento da notificação da decisão. ...
2016-06-21 - Case Details
The Panel accepts Complainant’s undisputed submission that bad faith registration and use of the Domain Name is further indicated by the fact that Respondent has been found to have registered and used domain names in bad faith in multiple other cases under the Policy which suggests a pattern of conduct on the part of Respondent, including but not limited to decisions in the following cases: LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp. / Maddisyn Fernandes, Fernandes Privacy Holdings,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-08-16 - Case Details
For the purpose of assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark, the Top Level-Domain <.eu> may be disregarded (LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o. / Mirek Nowakowski ROSTALCO Sp. z o.o.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-10-02 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have regularly ruled that bad faith was found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091 and Carrefour v. Jean-Claude Bot / Albert Pierre,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-11-26 - Case Details
A TLD suffix may generally be disregarded for the purposes of assessing confusing similarity under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-02-09 - Case Details
For the purpose of assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark, theTLD suffix “.com” may generally be disregarded (LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o. / Mirek Nowakowski ROSTALCO Sp. z o.o.,
WIPO Case No.
...
2018-02-08 - Case Details
For the purpose of assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark, the gTLD <.store> may be disregarded (LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o. / Mirek Nowakowski ROSTALCO Sp. z o.o.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-04-05 - Case Details
Domainproxyagent.com/Compsys Domain Solutions Private Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0615; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domainproxyagent.com and Compsys Domain Solutions Private Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0381; BolognaFiere S.p.A v. ...
2018-11-28 - Case Details
Rights or Legitimate Interests
According to established case law, the Complainant needs to show prima facie that the Respondent has no rights to or legitimate interests in the Domain Name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Moensch,
WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052).
While the overall burden of proof rests with the complainant, previous panels have recognized that this could result in the often impossible task of proving a negative, requiring information that is often primarily within the knowledge of the respondent. ...
2018-09-19 - Case Details
In previous decisions, panels have found that in the absence of any license or permission from the complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed (Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-06-05 - Case Details
This determination of this Panel extends beyond the idea of opportunistic bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-04-26 - Case Details
Previous UDRP panels have regularly ruled that bad faith was found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its use by someone, with no connection to the trademark, suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091 and Carrefour v. Jean-Claude Bot / Albert Pierre,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-04-25 - Case Details