The disputed domain name also contains the TLD suffix “.ltd” but a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the assessment of confusing similarity between a domain name and a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-01-19 - Case Details
A TLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-03-08 - Case Details
For the purpose of assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark, the generic Top-Level Domain suffix ".info" may be disregarded (LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Data Protection Sp. z o.o. / Mirek Nowakowski ROSTALCO Sp. z o.o.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-03-07 - Case Details
A more recent UDRP decision also held that “[t]his Panel agrees with previous Policy decisions to the effect that “knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of registration of the domain name suggests bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 (citing Caixa D´Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2018-05-03 - Case Details
Where the complainant's mark is so widely known that a respondent cannot credibly claim to have been unaware of the mark, panels have been prepared to hold that the domain name was registered in bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains by Proxy, Inc., DomainsByProxy.com / DBA David Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1839 ( and ). ...
2018-04-06 - Case Details
The gTLD suffix may generally be disregarded for the purposes of assessing confusing similarity under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-04-03 - Case Details
The Panel will have to establish whether the Complainant’s case meets the requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. See LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung,
WIPO Case No. D2012-1233; Charabot SA v. Name Redacted,
WIPO Case No. D2018-0339.
...
2018-10-08 - Case Details
D2018-1291, ; eBay Inc. v. ebayMoving / Izik Apo,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1307, ; LEGO Juris A/S v. DBA David Inc/ DomainsByProxy.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1290, .
Therefore, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks in which the Complainant has rights. ...
2018-10-08 - Case Details
When comparing a disputed domain name to a mark in question, it is well established that gTLDs may be disregarded. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Wang Keke,
WIPO Case No. D2014-2003. As the “.com” suffix of the Disputed Domain Name is merely a technical requirement for the operation of domain names, it will therefore not be considered on the issue of confusing similarity.
...
2019-01-04 - Case Details
D2017-2336; AB Electrolux v. Mostafa Faheem,
WIPO Case No. D2017-2233; LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davis,
WIPO Case No. D2018-0313 (noting the “Respondent cannot benefit from Oki Data since the Respondent has not accurately disclosed the lack of any relationship between it and the Complainant”).
...
2018-11-23 - Case Details
Finally, it appears that the Respondent’s emails are associated with similar domain names which relate to third party brands such as CAPITAL ONE, LEGO, PAYPAL, AMAZON and CITIZENS BANK. This is a further element that suggests a pattern of abusive registrations.
...
2018-10-31 - Case Details
Also previous UDRP panels have regularly ruled that bad faith was found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091 and Carrefour v. Jean-Claude Bot / Albert Pierre, supra.
...
2018-11-15 - Case Details
UDRP panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from the complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed (Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-11-26 - Case Details
Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o.,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0933 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-08-22 - Case Details
“In the absence of any license or permission from the complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the Disputed Domain Names could reasonably be claimed” (See LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-08-15 - Case Details
D2011-1851 where the disputed domain name was ; LEGO Juris A/S v. HindiraSubekti,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0110 where the disputed domain names included ; and Dreamworks Animation, LLC v. ...
2019-05-27 - Case Details
A gTLD suffix is generally disregarded for the purposes of assessing confusing similarity under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. Zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-28 - Case Details
A gTLD suffix is generally disregarded for the purposes of assessing confusing similarity under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. Zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-28 - Case Details
Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-25 - Case Details
The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns various trademark registrations in Japan and China long before the disputed domain name was registered and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (See LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-24 - Case Details