The Complainant’s trade mark rights in the LEGO mark have been recognized in a number of previous UDRP proceedings (including recent cases: LEGO Juris A/S v. Nasirudin, EazySmart.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0617; LEGO Juris A/S v. Owen Jones,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0537; LEGO Juris A/S v. Xianbin Chen,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0505; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-05-07 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Leo Wang
Case No. D2013-1084
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The website to which the disputed domain name resolves makes available Lego products and also other products for purchase via “www.amazon.com”. When accessed by the Panel the central panel of the website listed hyperlinked “lego” product numbers and selected “lego” product descriptions with prices and a “Buy from amazon” -button against a prominent background of colorful “lego” blocks, with the words ”lego pictures” in small print at the top. ...
2013-08-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Yuewei wang
Case No. D2011-1920
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Complainant has denied licensing or authorizing the Respondent to use the LEGO Trademark. The evidence also does not indicate that the Respondent is known by the name “Lego” or in any way associated with the LEGO Trademark. ...
2012-02-23 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...Furthermore, the BIONICLE line is a LEGO selling theme. The LEGO Group has applied for and/or registered the BIONICLE mark in over 30 countries.
...
2010-08-09 - Case Details
Hu Liang/Dolego
WIPO Case No. D2009-0848, LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. /Stop2Stop, G V
WIPO Case No.D2009-0784, LEGO Juris A/S v. ...The fame of the trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions: LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. 2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-02-22 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names <lego-au.com>, <lego-ca.com>, <lego-eu.com>, <lego-kids.com>, and <lego-uk.com> are registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain names, <lego-au.com>, <lego-ca.com>, <lego-eu.com>, <lego-kids.com>, and <lego-uk.com> be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2021-07-27 - Case Details
Presently, the Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. A computer-animated adventure comedy film featuring the Complainant’s construction toy characters under the name “The LEGO Movie” was released in 2014, and a direct sequel named “The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part” or “The LEGO Movie 2” (the “LEGO Movie”) was released in the United States on February 8, 2019.
...The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the LEGO mark. The Respondent has taken the LEGO mark in its entirety, and added the word “movie” followed by a hyphen and the number 2 to the LEGO mark. ...
2019-04-05 - Case Details
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademarks to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...The LEGO trademarks also risk being tarnished by being connected to the Respondent’s Website. By using the trademark LEGO as a dominant part of the Disputed Domain Name, the Respondent exploits the goodwill and the image of the LEGO trademarks, which may result in dilution and other damage for the LEGO trademarks. ...
2019-03-26 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Martin Schwaller
Case No. D2014-0788
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is based in Denmark (Annex 7 of the Complaint) and is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous Lego brands of construction toys and other Lego branded products.
...
2014-08-11 - Case Details
The Complainant notes that the worldwide revenues of the LEGO Group were more than USD 2,8 billion in 2009.
The Complainant submits that the fame of its LEGO trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions, including LEGO Juris A/S v. ...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. 2010-1260 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-08-31 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Client Care, Web Commerce Communications Limited
Case No. D2023-0915
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Complainant’s LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries worldwide, and through decades of use,
the LEGO mark has become famous as evidenced by Complainant being named TIME’s Most Influential Toy
of All Time.
...
2023-05-23 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Aubrey Trovada
Case No. D2011-0991
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Complainant
The Complainant states that it is the owner of the trademark LEGO and many other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...
2011-08-26 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Ryan Elsey
Case No. D2011-1438
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Wioletta Balcerak,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1320; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260; LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda /Privacy--Protect.org,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-11-02 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Lego Juris A/S v. Hunter Wilson
Case No. D2012-0767
1. The Parties
Complainant is Lego Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the LEGO Trademark, and recognizes (in line with affirmations of previous UDRP decisions) the famous nature of the LEGO Trademark.
...
2012-06-26 - Case Details
LEGO Juris A/S v. Howtogetrealmoneyonline.com, supra; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Hudson,
WIPO Case No. D2012-0060; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainsByProxy.com / DBA David Inc,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1288; Lego Juris A/S v. Adry Asry,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1224; LEGO Juris A/S v. James Mills,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1000; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-11-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Oleg Vasilyev
Case No. D2020-1694
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant has provided evidence that previous UDRP panels have determined the LEGO trademark (the “LEGO Trademark”) as being well-known or famous. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-09-14 - Case Details
The Complainant is based in Denmark (Annex 7 of Complaint) is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. By way of example, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2012, was almost USD 2,9 Billion.
...
2014-07-31 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names <lego-robotics.net>, <lego-table.net>, and (the “Domain Names”) are registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...The Domain Names, <lego-robotics.net>, <lego-table.net>, and were registered with the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. on May 28, 2011. ...
2012-03-07 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO, and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products (see 5.A below). ...The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies” or “the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...
2010-09-28 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar
There is no doubt that the Complainant and its licensee – the LEGO group – is the holder of the famous trademark LEGO. The LEGO group has rights in the trademark LEGO for construction toys and other LEGO branded products though registration all over the world but also through extensive, exclusive and continuous use for more than a half of century.
...The use of the LEGO trademark in connection with other words does not make the disputed domain names distinctive from the Complainant's trademark LEGO. ...
2009-08-17 - Case Details