About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.023 sec)

Rows

<<  <  1401 - 1420  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-2059 for airbusgroup.com html (15 KB)

I do not use this domain and I can transfer it to them, no problem, if they pay the costs, with pleasure” (see e.g. LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091 and cases cited therein); and - the use of a privacy service (i.e. the first Respondent) (see e.g. ...

2014-01-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0350 for michelinbaby.com html (15 KB)

The Respondent has not made any demonstrable preparations to use the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services and did not show any intention of noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name (Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu, WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2014-06-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0941 for electroluxyetkiliservisim.com html (14 KB)

Several panels have held that registering and using domain names which correspond to well-known trademarks suggests bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; and Sanofi-aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC, WIPO Case No. ...

2014-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1943 for 大众汽车.公司 html (14 KB)

A TLD suffix is usually disregarded under the confusing similarity test because it is a technical requirement of registration. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-11-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0603 for ikea3.com html (15 KB)

As decided in previous UDRP cases, “the test of identity or confusing similarity under the Policy is confined to a comparison of the disputed domain name and the trademark alone”. LEGO Juris A/S v. Name Administrator, Hong Kong Domains, LLC., WIPO Case No. D2009-0924. See also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...

2015-06-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0607 for realmadrid.science html (15 KB)

As decided in other UDRP cases, “the test of identity or confusing similarity under the Policy is confined to a comparison of the disputed domain name and the trademark alone”. LEGO Juris A/S v. Name Administrator, Hong Kong Domains, LLC., WIPO Case No. D2009-0924. See also Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...

2015-06-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0389 for gosport-nike.com html (15 KB)

According to consensus view among UDRP Panelists, neither the Policy nor the Rules expressly require the consent of a third party to file a complaint when the disputed domain name is comprised by trademarks owned by different entities and previous panels have accepted complaints requesting that a domain name may be transferred to the complainant, noting that such decision would be expressly without prejudice to any rights which may be asserted by a third party trademark holder (See, for instance, LEGO Juris A/S v. Suka LLC, WIPO Case No. D2011-1057; and Guccio Gucci S.p.A. v. Brenda Hawkins, WIPO Case No. ...

2015-04-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2248 for bousorama.info html (15 KB)

Partant, il est difficilement concevable que le Défendeur a pu ignorer les droits du Requérant dans la marque BOURSORAMA et n'a pas eu cette dernière à l'esprit au moment de l'enregistrement du nom de domaine litigieux en 2016, soit 21 ans après la fondation de la société BOURSORAMA (voir en ce sens Lego Juris A/S c. Reiner Stotte, Litige OMPI No. D2010-0494). Cette affirmation est d'autant plus vrai que le terme « boursorama » n'est pas un mot du dictionnaire et que ce terme n'existe donc pas en dehors des marques du Requérant. ...

2017-01-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2582 for ritalinadhd.com html (16 KB)

Then Complainant cited prior decisions where Panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from Complainant to use such widely-known trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu, WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...

2017-03-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2489 for bollore.top html (15 KB)

Partant, il est difficilement concevable que le Défendeur ait pu ignorer les droits du Requérant dans la marque BOLLORE et n’avait pas cette dernière à l’esprit au moment de l’enregistrement du nom de domaine litigieux en 2016, soit 194 ans après la fondation de la société BOLLORE (voir en ce sens Lego Juris A/S c. Reiner Stotte, Litige OMPI No. D2010-0494). La Commission administrative observe encore que le nom de domaine litigieux reproduit la marque BOLLORE du Requérant dans son intégralité, sans ajout de lettre ou de mot. ...

2017-02-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1494 for mansurgavrielbag.com html (16 KB)

A gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-09-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1754 for volkswagen.live, volkswagen.pub html (16 KB)

D2015-2175; see also Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan, WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1689 for volkswagen.host html (16 KB)

D2015-2175; see also Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan, WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-10-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0955 for wfashionmagazine.com html (16 KB)

In addition, it has been held in previous UDRP decisions that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name’s registration suggests bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...

2016-08-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0445 for lancomehair.com html (15 KB)

A gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei， WIPO Case No. ...

2016-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-2286 for k1xpatrickmohrmk5.com html (16 KB)

The disputed domain name also contains the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix “.com” but a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. (See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-02-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1938 for isetanmitsukoshi.com html (15 KB)

D2015-2175; See also Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan, WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-12-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2088 for pandorasubscription.com html (15 KB)

The Respondent is a serial cybersquatter who has been involved in several proceedings under the Policy and in each one has been ordered to transfer the domain names in issue. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Jared Burnup, WIPO Case No. D2013-1689, Eveready Battery Company, Inc. v. Jared Burnup, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-12-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2053 for prestamide.com html (16 KB)

D2015-2175; See also Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan, WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-12-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-2008 for topsolid.vip html (16 KB)

D2015-2175; see also Dassault (Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault) v. Ma Xiaojuan, WIPO Case No. D2015-1733; Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong, WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei, WIPO Case No. ...

2016-12-05 - Case Details

/contact/en/area.jsp?area=arbitration https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/disclaim.html https://www.wipo.int/en/web/privacy-policy/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/accessibility/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/sitemap.html https://www3.wipo.int/newsletters/en/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/podcasts/ https://www.wipo.int/news/en/