licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainants’ trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain...
2022-08-08 - Case Details
is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark...
2022-12-08 - Case Details
Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. D2010...
2023-01-13 - Case Details
the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd...
2023-01-13 - Case Details
faith: (LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (« La Caixa ») v. Eric Adam, WIPO Case No...
2023-01-09 - Case Details
otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure...
2023-01-05 - Case Details
amounts to bad-faith use, for the same reason (see, for example, LEGO Juris A/S v. Whoisguard Protected, Whoisguard, Inc. / Giovanni Bonny, WIPO Case No...
2023-01-02 - Case Details
the Marks clearly amounts to bad-faith use, for the same reason (see, for example, LEGO Juris A/S v. Whoisguard Protected, Whoisguard, Inc. / Giovanni...
2023-01-02 - Case Details
Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio...
2022-12-28 - Case Details
has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com...
2022-11-17 - Case Details
similarity page 4 under the first element (a specific reference to the addition of the term “discount”, see also LEGO Juris A/S v. Hongxia Wang, WIPO Case No...
2022-11-09 - Case Details
registration constitutes evidence, albeit not conclusive, of opportunistic bad faith (LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091; LANCOME PARFUMS ET...
2022-11-03 - Case Details
likelihood that the registrant was unaware of the established rights in the mark at the time the domain name was registered. See, e . g ., LEGO Juris A/S v...
2011-05-27 - Case Details
Complainant's trademark.” ( LEGO Juris A/S v. huangderong , WIPO Case No. D2009-1325 ). Combining a trademark with abbreviations to form a domain name also does...
2011-05-26 - Case Details
confusing similarity test because it is a technical requirement of registration. See Lego Juris A /S v. Chen Yong , WIPO Case No. D2009-1611 ; Dr. Ing. H.c. F...
2016-11-11 - Case Details
disputed domain name was registered in bad faith. The name registered by the Respondent, unlike, for example, “Lego” or “Coca-Cola” is a common, everyday...
2012-05-10 - Case Details
known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith ( LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte...
2012-08-16 - Case Details
suggests bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte , WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 (citing Caixa D´Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. Eric Adam...
2018-05-03 - Case Details
opportunistic bad faith. See , e.g., Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin, Maison Fondee en 1772 v. The Polygenix Group Co., WIPO Case No. D2000-0163 ; LEGO Juris A/S v...Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 ; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC. WIPO Case No. D2006-0303 ; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte, WIPO Case No...
2014-09-09 - Case Details
Overview 2.0 ”,第1.9段) 。而且,争议域名中用“-”符号将“sanofi” 跟“sun”分隔开来,更使得SANOFI商标成为争议域名最主要的识别部分。“.com”则是一通用顶级域名,本身也未具备任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong ,WIPO...主张或证据,以显示其在接到任何有关争议的通知之前,已使用争议域名或准备使用争议域名善意地提供商品或服务。更未见被投诉人提出证据显示,其对“sanofi”的字样享有商标权或相对应的注册公司、事业组织的名称,或者虽然其对“sanofi”不享有商标权,但被投诉人已因该争议域名而广为公众所知。( LEGO...
2013-07-25 - Case Details