The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the MICHELIN mark long
before the date that the disputed domain name was registered and that the Complainant is not affiliated with
nor has it licensed or otherwise authorised the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host
master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-10-09 - Case Details
D2019-0733; Inter IKEA
Systems BV (IISVB) v. Hosein Bagheri WIPO Case No. D2016-0432; LEGO Juris A/S v. Simonovi Eood
WIPO Case No. D2012-0863). Against this background there are neither indications for a bona fide offering
nor for a noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name (see Philip Morris Products S.A. v.
...
2024-06-06 - Case Details
The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the CARVANA mark long
before the dates that the disputed domain names were registered and that the Complainant is not affiliated
with nor has it licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see
LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host
master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-07-06 - Case Details
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion
Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By
Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-06-19 - Case Details
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-02-16 - Case Details
Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark
is shown to be well known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent must have been aware of the
Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when registering and using the Disputed Domain Names
given the well-known nature of the Complainant’s Trademark and the fact that it was put into use well before
the Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Names.
...
2025-12-05 - Case Details
Siendo, pues,
que la denominación BUILD-A-BEAR es inherentemente distintiva, las referidas adiciones resultan del todo
insuficientes para evitar la asociación con los signos distintivos de la Demandante, toda vez que
simplemente crea un plural que enfatiza las marcas de la Demandante acentuando la semejanza y
reforzando la impresión de que el Demandando bien podría ser su filial o asociado (LEGO Juris A/S v.
Frederik Soleimani, Caso OMPI D2012-2133 y Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. Carlos Fernández, Caso OMPI
No. ...
2026-01-19 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, the Respondent’s use of the Complainant’s mark and logo to purportedly offer products
and services similar to the Complainant’s products and services creates a misleading impression of affiliation
and does not amount to a fair use of the Disputed Domain Name (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain
Administrator, See PrivacyGuardian.org and Sun Chong, WIPO Case No. D2019-2263).
...
2022-05-27 - Case Details
The Complainant provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the MODERNA Marks long
before the date that the disputed domain name was registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it
licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademarks (see LEGO Juris A/S
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 5
v. ...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded
as giving rise to rights or legitimate interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed
domain name (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich, WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
Noting the risk of implied affiliation between the confusingly similar disputed domain name and the well-
known trademark of the Complainant, the Panel finds that there is no plausible fair use to which the disputed
domain name could be put that would not have the effect of being somehow connected to the Complainant
(see, e.g., Instagram, LLC v. ...
2022-06-24 - Case Details
The Complainant provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the MICHELIN mark long before
the date that the disputed domain name was registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or
otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademarks (see LEGO Juris A/S v.
DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO
Case No. ...
2022-09-19 - Case Details
The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations long before the date that the
disputed domain name was registered and that it is not affiliated with nor has it licensed or otherwise
permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd,
David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No.
...
2022-04-12 - Case Details
Similarly, previous panels have found that “Respondent’s use of the disputed domain names to establish “website coming soon” pages is not a bona fide offering of goods or services” (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Nofel Izz, JID,
WIPO Case No. D2019-2601).
The Panel agrees and considers that the disputed domain name is not used in connection to a bona fide offering of goods and services or a legitimate non-commercial or fair use.
...
2021-06-14 - Case Details
En este sentido véanse anteriores resoluciones, tales como el caso LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2021-06-29 - Case Details
Prior UDRP panels have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates the complainant’s trademark in its entirety (e.g., Carrefour SA v. Matias Barro Mares,
WIPO Case No. D2020-3088; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-05-03 - Case Details
Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo,
WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-05-19 - Case Details
In the Panel’s view, such conduct cannot be regarded as giving rise to rights or legitimate
interests on the part of the Respondent to register and use the disputed domain names (see, e.g., LEGO
Juris A/S v. Andrei Novakovich, WIPO Case No. D2016-1513).
The Panel also finds that the nature of the services provided on the websites at the disputed domain names,
in particular, adding followers contrary to the Complainant’s policies, cannot constitute a bona fide offering of
goods or services or legitimate noncommercial fair use (see, e.g., Andrey Ternovskiy dba Chatroulette v.
...
2022-10-12 - Case Details
The Complainant has provided evidence that it owns trademark registrations of the CARREFOUR mark long
before the date that the disputed domain names were registered, and that it is not affiliated with nor has it
licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainant’s trademark (see LEGO Juris A/S v.
DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO
Case No. ...
2022-07-15 - Case Details
D2021-0774; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo,
WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-10-18 - Case Details
These allegations make out a prima facie case that Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, which Respondent has not rebutted. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-10-11 - Case Details