与投诉人签了合作框架协议的上海汽车工业集团。 无论该合作进展与否,该公司与投诉人已有关联。 关于通用顶级域名,专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。(参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 及 Dr. Ing...
2017-06-08 - Case Details
with such a well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection with the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith ( LEGO Juris A/S v...
2017-05-04 - Case Details
括投诉人的名称和商标的域名并将该域名指向色情网站,其本身便构成恶意);LEGO Juris A/S 诉 bangfei jiang,WIPO 案件编号 D2012-1235。因此,被投诉人曾经将争议域名用于色情网站的这一行 为构成恶意,且专家组认为被投诉人的这一行为损害了投诉人商标的声誉,破坏了投诉...
2023-07-12 - Case Details
registration in bad faith. (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Floyd Goddard/ Oneandone, Private Registration, WIPO Case No. D2010-0544, the panel stated: “The Panel, in...
2022-10-12 - Case Details
“[t]he disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark LEGO, the mere inclusion of an additional letter, in the present case the letter “s...
2006-08-21 - Case Details
D2009-0093 and followed in Intersections Inc. v. Jasper Developments Pty. Ltd ., WIPO Case No. D2009-0795 ; LEGO Juris A/S v. Above.com Domain Privacy...
2010-06-01 - Case Details
。( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong ,WI PO 案件编号 D2009-1611)。所以, 专家组认为,“tata”是争议域名中可清楚识别的部分,是混淆性相似测验中唯一考虑的因素。 被投诉人虽抗辩,被投诉人网站中的图片与投诉方的商标,起码有超过十个部分的区别。然而,根据政策第 4 条(a...
2018-08-28 - Case Details
。 “.com”是一个通用顶级域名,属于标准注册要求,因此在第一个要素下的混淆性相似测验中不予考虑。( LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 )。所以,专家组认为,投诉人的TATA商标仍为争议域名的可识别部分。 因此,专家组认定争议域名与投诉人的TATA...
2018-08-06 - Case Details
sometimes be found to support other factors indicating good faith or legitimate interests (see, LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr , WIPO Case No. D2015-1311...
2018-01-04 - Case Details
册和使用争议域名。参见 WIPO Overview 3.0 ,第 3.3 段; Telstra Corporation Limited 诉 Nuclear Marshmallows , WIPO案件编号D2000-0003 和 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 lihailiang , WIPO 案...
2017-11-24 - Case Details
the complaint succeeds under this head”. 5 See Do The Hustle, LLC v. Tropic Web , Caso OMPI No. D2000-0624 . 6 Ver LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung . Caso...
2018-03-09 - Case Details
reasonably be claimed ( LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master WIPO Case No. D2010-0138...
2019-11-28 - Case Details
Service , WIPO Case No. D2009-1657 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. / Domains Secured, LLC , WIPO Case No. D2011-1857 . In Four...
2019-10-29 - Case Details
between a domain name and a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A /S v. Chen Yong , WIPO Case No. D2009-1611 ; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche...
2019-10-10 - Case Details
”) suffix “.com”. A gTLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison between a domain name and a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego...
2019-09-25 - Case Details
a domain name and a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A /S v. Chen Yong , WIPO Case No. D2009-1611 ; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche...
2019-08-06 - Case Details
组决定接受投诉人所提交的英文版投诉书和投诉书修正本及相关材料,不要求投诉人提供中文翻译文本。专家组认为这一决定并不会给当事双方造成不公平且能促使行政程序高效及经济地进行。并且,专家组决定使用中文作出本案裁决。参见 LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Zhong Huijie , WIPO 案件编号...
2019-05-23 - Case Details
in LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd , David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Hostmaster , WIPO Case No. D2010-0138 . The Panel...
2019-05-02 - Case Details
Name, the complaint succeeds under this head.” 5 See Do The Hustle, LLC v. Tropic Web , Caso OMPI No. D2000-0624 . 6 Ver LEGO Juris A/S v. NyunHwa Jung...
2021-05-05 - Case Details
LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong , WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 及 Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei , WIPO案件编号D2014-0080 。因此,专家组认为争议域名与投诉人的注册商标TMALL混淆性相似。 因此,专家组认定...
2021-07-12 - Case Details