WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Media Harmony Pty Ltd, George Alcantara
Case No. D2011-1369
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The words are used in connection with Complainant’s toy products; ”lego city” could be believed by consumers to be a fictive “LEGO city”, and complainant has shops online.
...
2011-10-26 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. mohd halimi zulkifli
Case No. D2011-1038
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations relating to the LEGO products going back to 1953. LEGO products are regularly sold in about 130 countries around the globe. ...
2011-09-09 - Case Details
Complainant is the owner of a number of trademarks, including European Community Trademark, registration no. 39800 for LEGO and Australian trademark, registration no. B129.258 for LEGO.
Further, Complainant is the owner of over 2400 domain names containing the LEGO trademarks.
...The Panel refers to Lego Juris A/S v. Nasirudin, Eazysmart.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0617.
As for the disputed domain name , it only differs from Complainant’s mark LEGO by adding the generic suffix ”incc’ to the domain name, and is, as such, confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark LEGO.
...
2012-05-15 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its LEGO trademark in which it has exclusive rights worldwide through trademark registration and use. The dominant part of the disputed domain name incorporates the term “lego”, identical to the Complainant’s LEGO trademark, followed by the letter “s” which refers to the plural of “lego” and the descriptive term “shop”.
...At the time of rendering this administrative decision these sponsored links were: “All Lego Star War Toys”, “Discount Weekly Hotel Rates”, “Lego Batman”, “Lego train shop”, “Lego star war mini figure”, “Lego monster sets”, “All lego star war toys”, “Shop building”, “Lego star wars droid sets”, and “New lego ninjago”, eight out of ten of these links containing the LEGO trademark of the Complainant.
...
2015-06-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of LEGO trademarks used in connection with construction toys and other products. The LEGO trademarks of the Complainant are registered in various countries and include in particular a LEGO trademark registered in the United Arab Emirates. The LEGO trademark has been used for over 50 years. In 2009, the revenue for the LEGO group was more than USD 2,8 billion. ...
2013-01-09 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Milton Alfredo
Case No. D2012-1992
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital
Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The revenue for the LEGO Group in 2009 was more than US D2, 8 billion. In particular, the Complainant also holds several trademark registrations for LEGO in the U.K. ...
2012-12-28 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of a number of trademark registrations for LEGO and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Panel was provided with examples of packaging Complainant’s LEGO SYSTEM products and a description of the LEGO System published on the website "www.lego.com" and informed that the LEGO Group spent at least several million dollars to promote and advertise its LEGO SYSTEM products.
...
2004-01-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Henry Jufri, Bayao Studio
Case No. D2021-2246
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries.
...
2021-09-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Above.com Domain Privacy/ Shu Lin
Case No. D2012-0426
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Complainant is the owner of a number of trademarks, including European Community Trademark, registration no. 39800 for LEGO and Australian trademark registration no. B129.258 for LEGO.
Further, Complainant is the owner of over 2400 domain names containing the LEGO trademarks.
...
2012-05-14 - Case Details
The Lego Star Wars product line has generated substantial sales.
The Domain Name resolves to a website on which Lego products are offered for sale. ...The Panel notes that the same result was reached in various other UDRP decisions, including LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Vierling,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1913 (), and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-02-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Guntur Adhyatma
Case No. D2012-0680
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is the holder of the LEGO trademark and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products (Annex 6 of the Complaint). ...
2012-06-11 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. nam jong Gang
Case No. DCO2021-0058
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered trademark rights in the LEGO mark worldwide, including in Colombia and Republic of Korea. The Disputed Domain Name reproduces the LEGO mark in its entirety. ...
2021-09-27 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant or its predecessors has used the mark LEGO since 1953 for construction toys and the Lego group owns trade mark registrations for this mark all over the world. ...The revenue for the LEGO group in 2009 was more than 2.8 billion. LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The Complainant has a LEGO ambassador program with members situated in Thailand. ...
2010-12-06 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the LEGO trademark used in connection with the
famous LEGO construction toys and other LEGO-branded products. ...A large banner image featured an
individual assembling LEGO sets, accompanied by a highlighted box stating “Revente de produits LEGO”
(resale of LEGO products) and a “Shop all” button. ...
2025-12-23 - Case Details
专家组按中心为确保规则第7条得到遵守所规定的要求，提交了《接受书和公正独立声明》。
4. 基本事实
投诉人是LEGO Juris A/S，其位于丹麦，在玩具制造销售界享有盛誉。在很多个国家拥有LEGO商标、及与LEGO商标相关联的其它商标的商标权，包括中国。投诉人前身于1953年就在美利坚合众国制造与销售LEGO商标的积木玩具。投诉人自80年代初就在中国注册了关于LEGO的商标。投诉人的的下属及分支机构遍布全世界，LEGO商标的产品被销往130多个国家，包括中国。投诉人还于2007年9月在中国北京的世界购物中国开设旗舰店。投诉人拥有上千个含“lego”字样的域名。
...
2011-11-03 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for LEGO (the “LEGO Mark”) in jurisdictions including a registration for the LEGO Mark in the United States of America, registered on August 26, 1975 (registration number 1018875) for goods in international class 28.
...The Domain Names each reproduce the LEGO Mark along with additional generic words or geographical terms that do not distinguish the Domain Names from the LEGO Mark.
...
2020-11-17 - Case Details
Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840, “LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260, “In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”; and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...Elsewhere in the Response, Respondent refers to the “the brand LEGO” and to “copyright names LEGOLAND or LEGO”. Complainant referred at length in the Complaint to its trademark registrations throughout the world for its trademarks LEGO and LEGOLAND. ...
2011-09-22 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. 李君 (Li Jun)
Case No. D2023-0210
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Complainant is the owner of numerous registered trademarks for the LEGO mark globally, including:
- Danish registered trademark no. VR195400604 for LEGO word mark, registered on May 1, 1954; and
- Chinese registered trademark no. 135134 for LEGO mark, registered on January 5, 1980.
...
2023-03-06 - Case Details
The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
4. Factual Background
The Complainant, LEGO Juris A/S, a limited company incorporated in Denmark, is the owner of the LEGO trademark and of all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO branded construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-10-21 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark LEGO. The fame of the Complainant’s trademark LEGO was confirmed by numerous previous UDRP panel decisions (for example, see LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. 2009-0680; LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-02-15 - Case Details