About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.03 sec)

Rows

<<  <  501 - 520  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-5163 for lego.eco, lego.luxe pdf (147 KB)

Factual Background Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Denmark. It is the owner of LEGO trademarks used in connection with the LEGO construction toys and other LEGO branded products. The Lego Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations for the LEGO mark in many jurisdictions around the world, including the Canadian trademark registration LEGO (word), no. ...

2025-03-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1338 for legonxt20.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Muhamad Riza Nadoa Case No. D2011-1338 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Among the latter is a construction set sold under the name LEGO NXT 2.0. With its Complaint, Complainant submitted an annex showing that Respondent’s domain name resolves to a page on the “www.amazon.com” website promoting the sale of various LEGO products, notably including the LEGO NXT 2.0 robotic construction set. ...

2011-10-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-2834 for legoeducational.com html (16 KB)

The Complainant owns the following trademarks in the United States: LEGO, United States Reg. No. 1,026,871, registered on December 9, 1975, in International class 28 for toy building blocks; and LEGO, United States Reg. ...The Panel concludes that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the LEGO Mark. It is uncontroverted that the Complainant has established rights in the LEGO Mark based on its many years of use as well as its registered trademarks for the LEGO Mark in the United States and many jurisdictions worldwide. ...

2020-01-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2393 for legopakistan.com pdf (147 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Zulfiqar Zaria, IP Zone Technologies Case No. D2023-2393 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Synergy Management, Fred Shear, WIPO Case No. D2007-1028 (“LEGO is well-known in the United States”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Chung Hong Phil, WIPO Case No. D2009-1288 (“the Complainant’s trademarks are very well-known worldwide”). ...

2023-08-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2160 for 3mlego.com pdf (149 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Mohammad Javad Motavaselian, GreenHost Case No. D2023-2160 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Synergy Management, Fred Shear, WIPO Case No. D2007-1028 (“LEGO is well-known in the United States”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Chung Hong Phil, WIPO Case No. D2009-1288 (“the Complainant’s trademarks are very well-known worldwide”)). ...

2023-08-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2139 for jordanlego.com, lego-jo.com, lego-jordan.com, legojordan.com pdf (144 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. khaleel masri Case No. D2023-2139 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The Domain Names and Registrar The disputed domain names , <lego-jo.com>, <lego-jordan.com>, and are all registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...

2023-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1676 for legobuilda.com html (16 KB)

The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The LEGO group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...No. VR 1954 00604, registered on May 1, 1954). LEGO is a well-known trademark. The disputed domain name was registered on April 1, 2018 and is used for a website offering LEGO toys. ...

2018-10-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0114 for wwwlegofriends.com html (15 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Above.com Domain Privacy / Ready Asset, Nish Patel Case No. D2013-0114 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant has also provided evidence of the significant worldwide recognition of the LEGO brand dating back to the 1950s. The Panel finds this sufficient to establish that the Complainant also enjoys significant unregistered rights in the name and mark LEGO in numerous territories worldwide and, further, that the mark LEGO has the status of a “well-known” trademark. ...

2013-03-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0081 for geeklego.com html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains By Proxy, LLC/ Russell Grodack Case No. D2013-0081 1. The Parties The Complainant is Lego Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant has also provided evidence of the significant worldwide recognition of the LEGO brand dating back to the 1950s. The Panel finds this sufficient to establish that the Complainant also enjoys significant unregistered rights in the name and mark LEGO in numerous territories worldwide and, further, that the mark LEGO has the status of a “well-known” trademark. ...

2013-03-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-1591 for legohublimited.net, legolandialtd.net, legolandltd.net pdf (158 KB)

Lastly, the websites associated with the disputed domain names contained English-language phrases, including “LEGO Multiverse LTD,” “LEGO PRICE DROPS,” and “Your Ultimate Destination for LEGO Sets,” indicating that the Respondent is capable of understanding and using English in a commercial context. ...The websites gave the false impression of being official LEGO-branded platforms, thereby misleading consumers. Specifically, the websites displayed prominent declarations such as: “LEGO Land Ltd - Your Ultimate Destination for LEGO Sets” and “Welcome to LEGO Land Ltd, your go-to store for an incredible selection of LEGO® sets for kids, adults, and everyone in between!”. ...

2025-06-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2446 for piratesofthecaribbeanlego.com html (21 KB)

Rampe Purda, WIPO Case No. 2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator; WIPO Case No. 2010-1260; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. D2009-0680; LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp., WIPO Case No. D2008-1692 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. ...

2013-02-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1794 for gd-lego.com html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Mcconnell, Linda Case No. D2013-1794 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant believes that due to the wide recognition of the LEGO trademark, the Respondent must have known the Complainant and its LEGO trademarks when registering the disputed domain name. ...

2013-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-0313 for elego-brand.com, legoksa.com pdf (142 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. Nawaf Hariri, Salla Application Company Case No. D2025-0313 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant is in the business of selling construction toys and other products branded with its LEGO trademark. It owns trademark registrations for the LEGO mark in jurisdictions around the world, including a registration in Saudi Arabia (Reg. ...

2025-04-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0683 for legobox.net html (12 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Anson’s studio Case No. D2013-0683 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Respondent’s website contains several links offerring LEGO products, such as “Cheap LEGO Bricks”, “LEGO Toys for Sale”, or related services (the screen shot of the website1 as provided in Annex 11 to the Complaint). ...

2013-07-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2478 for a-legobet88jaya.com, legobet88-resmi.com, legobet88.info, legobet88.ink, legobet88alternatif.xyz, legobet88amp.com, legobet88bertahan.com, legobet88bertahan10.com, legobet88bertahan11.com, legobet88bertahan12.com, legobet88bertahan13.com, legobet88bertahan14.com ... pdf (167 KB)

Notably, the Complainant contends that it is the owner of the very well-known trademark LEGO, and that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to said trademark, as the dominant part of the disputed domain names comprise the term LEGO, identical to the registered trademark LEGO of the Complainant. ...Almost all the disputed domain names wholly incorporate the LEGO trademark as their initial element, and one of the disputed domain names has an “a” and a hyphen before LEGO. ...

2024-10-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0788 for lego592.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Song Jiapeng Case No. D2011-0788 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services of Sweden. ...Factual Background The Complainant is a company based in Denmark and is the owner of the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other Lego products. The Complainant has licensees who are authorized to exploit the Complainant’s trade mark rights in LEGO all over the world including China. ...

2011-07-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0450 for legosmindstorm.org html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Intrexium Ltd, Lars Andersson Case No. D2012-0450 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Complainant asserts Respondent is using the LEGO and MINDSTORMS trademarks to mislead Internet users to commercial websites and that the Respondent is therefore tarnishing the trademark LEGO. ...

2012-05-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4378 for legoflorist.com, legoflower.shop, legoflowerbouguet.com, legoflowerbouguets.com pdf (148 KB)

The Complainant owns inter alia the following LEGO trademark registrations: - the International Trademark Registration for LEGO, No. 287932, registered on August 27, 1964; and - the United States of America Trademark Registration for LEGO, No. 4395578, registered on September 3, 2013. The Complainant further owns (amongst many others) the domain name which addresses the of f icial LEGO website. The Complainant’s product lines now extend beyond toys, notably, it of fers a LEGO Botanical Collection featuring buildable f lower and plant sets (essentially f loral-themed LEGO products). ...

2025-12-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-4393 for legostore.online pdf (170 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Holding A/S v. trian xt Case No. D2025-4393 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. 4. Factual Background The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S (formerly LEGO Juris A/S), a worldwide known toymaker founded in 1932. LEGO branded products have been marketed and sold for decades in more than 130 countries worldwide, through authorized licensees. ...

2025-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1329 for iranlego.com pdf (183 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Mandegarweb Team Case No. D2022-1329 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Factual Background According to the Complaint, Complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Denmark. Complainant is the owner of LEGO trademarks used in connection with the Lego construction toys and other Lego branded products. The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...

2022-06-27 - Case Details