About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 2341   document(s)s (0.032 sec)

Rows

<<  <  601 - 620  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-0895 for legotoys.online html (18 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Khoa Ngo \u0110\u1ee9c Case No. D2020-0895 1. The Parties Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...Factual Background Complainant, a company incorporated and based in Denmark, is a global toy manufacturing company and the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the Lego brand of construction toys and other Lego branded products. ...

2020-07-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1869 for legotechnic8110.com html (16 KB)

According to the Complaint, the Complainant is a Danish company that owns the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products, which it licenses to related entities that manufacture and distribute such toys and other products around the world. The Complainant and its predecessors in title have been in business from the early years of the twentieth century, producing children’s toys since 1932 and using the LEGO trademark since 1934. The Complainant and its licensees (collectively the “LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”) have grown to a worldwide business, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2009 exceeding USD 2.8 billion. ...

2012-01-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0771 for thelego.space pdf (155 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Dan Wei Case No. D2023-0771 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...It argues that the dominant part of the disputed domain name comprises the term “Lego”, which is identical to the registered trademark LEGO. It states that the fame of the trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions, such as LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2023-04-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1814 for legokand.com html (21 KB)

Reyes Campello Estebaranz Sole Panelist Date: August 13, 2021 1 With reference to the well-known character of the LEGO trademark, see inter alia: LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO Case No. D2009-0680; LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench, WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Kim S J, WIPO Case No. D2014-0884; and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2021-08-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0839 for legoplaysets.com html (12 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Online Toy Superstore Case No. D2010-0839 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...Lego Juris A/S is a well-known large corporation that manufactures, among other products, toys. According to the non-contested allegations provided by the Complainant, the latter is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction of toys and other LEGO branded products. ...

2010-08-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2442 for legohogwarts.com html (10 KB)

Factual Background The following facts are alleged by the Complainant and not disputed by the Respondent. Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S. It is based in Denmark and is the owner of LEGO, and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Indeed, the LEGO trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous. The Complainant is also the owner of more than 1,000 domain names containing the term “lego”. ...

2013-02-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-2104 for legonew.com html (11 KB)

Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. ...Besides, the expression chosen by the Respondent to compose the disputed domain name together with “LEGO” is “new”, which plays no role in attempting to diverse the attention from the mark LEGO registered by the Complainant. ...

2021-09-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2276 for legoshop.space html (11 KB)

Factual Background Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products, including computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations throughout the world for the mark LEGO, including in China, where Complainant’s authorized licensees are authorized to use the LEGO mark. ...

2018-01-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1643 for legomen.com html (10 KB)

Factual Background Complainant is based in Denmark and is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. The LEGO Group's revenue in 2009, was more than USD 2,8 billion. ...

2011-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2068 for mindstormslego.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Linecom Case No. D2012-2068 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in Korea. The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO mark, and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys around the world. ...

2013-01-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0110 for legolaptop.com, legolaptop.net, legolaptop.org html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. HindiraSubekti Case No. D2013-0110 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden. ...The Complainant has also provided evidence of the significant worldwide recognition of the LEGO brand dating back to the 1950s. The Panel finds this sufficient to establish that the Complainant also enjoys significant unregistered rights in the name and mark LEGO in numerous territories worldwide and, further, that the mark LEGO has the status of a “well-known” trademark. ...

2013-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0609 for wishlego.com pdf (405 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant in this proceeding is Lego Juris A/S, the owner of the trade marks LEGO identifying in particular the well-known construction toys. ...Besides, the magazine Time has classified LEGO as the no. 1 among the most influential toys of all time, in an article published in 2014. The trade mark LEGO is registered worldwide. ...

2023-03-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4337 for legoleaks.online, legoleaks.store pdf (146 KB)

Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to its well-known trade mark LEGO. The domain names both reproduce the Complainant’s trade mark LEGO as a dominant and distinctive element. ...In the present case, the Panel notes that the Respondent has registered two domain names composed of the trade mark LEGO associated with the suffix “leaks” generally used by LEGO fans to refer to new products in development. ...

2024-01-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2380 for legopromotion.com, legopromotion.store html (19 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo Case No. D2020-2380 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant further contends that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark LEGO since the dominant part of the disputed domain names comprises the term “lego”. The fame of the LEGO trademark has been confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions. ...

2020-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0772 for papelerialego.com html (24 KB)

Rampe Purda, Caso OMPI No. D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Heihachi.net, Heihachi Ltd WHOIS-PROTECTION, Caso OMPI No. D2010-0821; LEGO Juris A/S v. Granite Real Estate, Caso OMPI No. D2010-0819; o LEGO Juris A/S v. Phoenix Productions, Caso OMPI No. D2010-0798) han considerado que las marcas LEGO han adquirido un carácter renombrado a nivel internacional. ...

2010-08-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1313 for legochina.net html (15 KB)

A. 相同或混淆性相似 LEGO是投诉人的注册商标及商号。根据投诉人提交的证据,其持续使用LEGO商标生产和销售玩具产品至今已有超过60年的历史。专家组同意,LEGO商标在玩具产品的领域里享有极高的知名度。投诉人至少自1976年起在中国对LEGO享有注册商标权。专家组认定投诉人通过注册及使用对该商标享有权利。 争议域名的主体部分由“lego”和“china”两部分组成。其中的“lego”与投诉人商标LEGO完全相同。附加“china”(可翻译成“中国”)的地理名词,不但不能将争议域名与投诉人的商标有效区分开来,还加强了其之间的混淆性。...

2015-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0038 for legoclub.com html (34 KB)

The mark LEGO is one of the most famous in the world. At its website "www.lego.com" Complainant has for several years used the expression LEGO CLUB in relation to web pages for a LEGO enthusiasts’ online membership club. ...Complainant The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s LEGO and LEGO CLUB marks. Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, which Respondent registered long after Complainant had established rights in its LEGO and LEGO CLUB marks through extensive use: see Fiber-Shield Industries, Inc. v. ...

2003-03-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DSO2011-0002 for lego.so html (22 KB)

专家组按中心为确保规则第7条得到遵守所规定的要求,提交了《接受书和公正独立声明》。 4. 基本事实 投诉人是LEGO Juris A/S,其位于丹麦,在玩具制造销售界享有盛誉。在很多个国家拥有LEGO商标、及与LEGO商标相关联的其它商标的商标权,包括中国和索马里(见投诉书附件6)。投诉人前身于1959年就在美利坚合众国制造与销售LEGO商标的积木玩具。...投诉人也未发现任何证据表明被投诉人以其他方式获得在争议域名中合法使用“lego”的权利。被投诉人没有得到投诉人任何关于使用LEGO商标的许可或授权。 投诉人主张被投诉人在注册争议域名时不可能不知道投诉人对LEGO商标的法律权益。LEGO是世界知名商标。被投诉人如今对争议域名的使用不属于善意(bona fide)提供商品或服务。...

2011-10-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0394 for legolandpackage.org html (23 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Admin/ Peter Wong Case No. D2014-0394 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden. ...The trademarks LEGO and LEGOLAND are among the best-known trademarks in the world, and the LEGO trademark and brands, as well as LEGOLAND have been recognized as being famous. ...

2014-05-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-1333 for lego88sg.com, lego88sg.toys, legoland88.com pdf (150 KB)

ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION LEGO Juris A/S v. yean kwa, Emperor Case No. D2024-1333 1. The Parties The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden. ...The Complainant also has LEGOLAND theme parks, with about 1.4 million visitors per year. The Complainant is the owner of numerous LEGO, LEGOLAND, and other trademarks throughout the world, used in connection with its LEGO branded products, including the following registrations: - LEGO, United States of America (“United States”) Trademark Registration No. 1018875, registered August 8, 1975, in class 28; - LEGO, Singaporean Trademark Registration No. ...

2024-06-20 - Case Details