WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Konrad Bodurkiewicz, CONSOLIDO Sp. z o.o.
Case No. D2015-1398
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...The LEGO trademark has been registered around the world by the Complainant, including in Poland. The registrations include, inter alia, a Community Trademark number 39800 dated October 5, 1998 for the word LEGO ("the Mark").
...
2015-11-09 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. school
Case No. D2011-0639
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...It uses these marks to promote the sale of its products in over 130 countries, including Thailand. In 2009 the revenue of the Lego group was more than US D2.8 billion. Since 1999, the Complainant has had a licence concerning the use of the trade mark STAR WARS in relation to the Lego product line, a trade mark referring to the popular films of that name. ...
2011-06-17 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Liu Bo
Case No. D2016-1011
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...In this case, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant's trademark LEGO in its entirety. The addition of the string "toysrus" does nothing to diminish this confusing similarity. ...
2016-07-12 - Case Details
CENTRO
DE ARBITRAJE
Y MEDIACIÓN
DECISIÓN DEL PANEL ADMINISTRATIVO
LEGO Juris A/S c. Legoland Pelotero, Legoland
Caso No. D2023-3121
1. Las Partes
La Demandante es LEGO Juris A/S, Dinamarca, representada por CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Suecia.
...La Demandante es accionista de Merlin Entertainments, que gestiona, en calidad de propietario, los parques
temáticos familiares LEGOLAND centrados en los juguetes LEGO.
La Demandante es titular de las marcas LEGO y LEGOLAND en numerosas jurisdicciones. A modo de
ejemplo:
- Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Industrial (Argentina) para LEGO con número de registro 2212416 y
con fecha de registro 31 de enero de 2008...
2023-10-06 - Case Details
It is a company based in Denmark which for many years has supplied what it calls “construction toys”, but many others would describe as simply “Lego” or “Lego bricks”, under the LEGO brand. The revenue for the Lego group of companies in 2009 was more than USD 2.8 billion. One of the Complainant’s product lines is “Lego City”.
4.2 The Complainant is the owner of a large number of trade marks that comprise or incorporate the term “Lego”. ...
2012-01-10 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Host Master, Njalla Okta LLC
Case No. D2025-2860
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Factual Background
Complainant owns the trademark LEGO (hereinafter the “Mark”), which has been ranked as one of the best-
known trademarks worldwide. For instance, Superbrands UK,1 ranked the LEGO Mark as the number two
Consumer Superbrand (second only to ROLEX) and number two in the Consumer Relevancy Index. ...
2025-09-23 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names <lego.中文网> and <lego.在线> are registered with 1API GmbH
(the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on September 11, 2014. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain names <lego.中文网> and <lego.在线> be transferred to the Complainant.
Sebastian M.W. Hughes
Sole Panelist
Dated: November 13, 2014...
2014-11-19 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. sen xiao
Case No. D2025-4876
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trade mark, and all other trade marks used in connection with the
LEGO brand of construction toys and other products. ...
2026-02-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Kamran Khan
Case No. D2019-0013
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Moreover, the Reputation Institute nominated the LEGO Group as number 2 on their list of “the World’s Most Reputable Companies” 2018. Last but not least, in 2014, TIME also announced LEGO to be the Most Influential Toy of All Time.
...
2019-03-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Super Privacy Service LTD c/o Dynadot
Case No. D2019-1530
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant is a worldwide well-known company, famous for its construction toys and other LEGO branded products. The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and Lego products are sold in more than 130 countries, including the United States. ...
2019-08-28 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. NPAig, LLC, 100ig.com
Case No. D2025-4363
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The
Complainant employs more than 28,500 individuals and its Lego products are sold in more than 130
countries, including the United States. The Lego Group has also built several family amusement parks
around the world, focusing on the LEGO building.
...
2025-12-18 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. AMAR BRIOUE
Case No. D2024-2565
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Hughes
Sole Panelist
Date: August 13, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. AMAR BRIOUE
Case No. D2024-2565
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-08-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Michael Schutt
Case No. D2016-1082
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...In this case, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant’s trademark LEGO in its entirety. The addition of the suffix “shop” does nothing to diminish this confusing similarity. ...
2016-07-27 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. wang si tan
Case No. D2024-0129
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...Complainant
The Complainant is a company incorporated in Denmark and the owner of the trade mark LEGO which is
famous for its construction toys.
In addition to numerous registrations worldwide for its LEGO trade mark (e.g., Chinese trademark
registration No. 1248861, with a registration date of February 21, 1999), the Complainant is also the owner of
registrations for its LEGO MASTERS trade mark (the “Trade Mark”), including Chinese registration No.
38863474, with a registration date of April 14, 2020.
...
2024-03-13 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Maya Ron
Case No. D2020-0933
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Complainant is the owner of numerous registrations of its LEGO trade mark (“Complainant’s Mark”) with the earliest one being registered in 1955, as well as approximately 5,000 domain names containing the term “lego”. ...
2020-06-23 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Hulmiho Ukolen, Poste restante / Domain Admin, Whois protection, this company does not own this domain name s.r.o.
...The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark LEGO. The disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant's trademark in its entirety combined with the generic terms "stars" and "starwarsgames".
...
2016-07-11 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. LC Internet Marketing
Case No. D2009-0953
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Since March 1999 the Lego group has operated in Carlsbad, California, just North of San Diego, a theme park known as Legoland California.
...
2009-08-26 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION RELATED TO THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LANGUAGE OF THE ADR PROCEEDING
LEGO Juris A/S v. Justyna Niedzielska, PHU C.N.O. JUSTYNA NIEDZIELSKA
Case No. DEUL2020-0004
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar
The disputed domain name is <lego-land.eu>.
The Registry of the disputed domain name is the European Registry for Internet Domains (“EURid” or the “Registry”. ...
2021-01-21 - Case Details
These generic words are non distinctive and the addition of these words do not impede a finding of confusing similarity with the trademark, as the trademark is the dominant feature of the disputed domain names. See for instance Lego Juris A/S v. Gloria Wilson,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2444. (Where the domain name was found confusingly similar to the LEGO trademark; and it was held that neither the addition of the word “review” nor the addition of the gTLD “.info”, interfered with a finding of confusing similarity with the mark). ...See Lego Juris A/S v. Guo Rong, supra, citing Lego Juris v, Andrew Vierling,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1913, where it was discussed that such a respondent could at best be described as an intermediary or a middle man, profiteering from the unauthorized use of the complainant’s trademark in a domain name to redirect Internet users to a location where the complainant’s products may be purchased.
...
2013-03-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Technicians, WorldInternetAuthority.com
Case No. D2021-1424
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...See LEGO Juris A/S v. World Internet Authority,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1467 (“the First Case”).
The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on October 22, 2018.
...
2021-07-26 - Case Details