’ Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...registered trademark AIR FRANCE. The Complainant submits that the domain name is confusingly similar because it incorporates as a dominant element the...
2008-02-06 - Case Details
the Complainant. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant i. Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant’s Mark The Complainant contends...that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. The Complainant...
2007-04-11 - Case Details
website featuring internet dating services and internet social networking services. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar...confusingly similar to the trademark. Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant submits that the Respondent is not commonly known by the word “gaydar”. The...
2011-03-25 - Case Details
the Complainant. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns the trademark CAISSE D’EPARGNE, registered...the trademark CAISSE D’EPARGNE when it registered a confusingly similar domain name; (ii) the Respondent’s replacement of the dash “-” by the number “6...
2011-06-03 - Case Details
December 1, 1992. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly...Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant contends...
2009-06-30 - Case Details
registered on February 16, 2010. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...Case No. D2002-0775 , “This conduct, commonly referred to as ‘typo squatting’, creates a virtually identical and/or confusingly similar mark to the...
2010-11-02 - Case Details
that the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark, ROACCUTANE, and the mark ACCUTANE, which is still...confusingly similar to the trademark; and (ii) The respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and (iii) The domain name has...
2012-04-19 - Case Details
which revert to an e-commerce website operated by a third party. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar At the time the...a confusingly similar domain name; (ii) the Respondent’s addition of the geographical descriptor “Toronto” actually increases the risk of confusion...
2011-09-19 - Case Details
5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns the trademark ORANGE, registered as United Kingdom...ORANGE when it registered a confusingly similar domain name, especially in view of the significant business presence in India where the Respondent resides...
2011-08-29 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant makes the following contentions. Identical or Confusingly Similar First, the Complainant states that the...disputed domain name should be considered as confusingly similar to its prior rights since the disputed domain name consists of the first...
2022-07-14 - Case Details
5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant A.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that as found in Section 4 above it is the owner of...it is registered and used. Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered trademarks for or...
2010-09-13 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. In creating the disputed domain names...“generator” to the Complainant’s trademark, thereby making the disputed domain names confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The fact that such...
2022-10-12 - Case Details
letter. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the...(Policy, paragraph 4(a)): (i) the Disputed Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2022-11-22 - Case Details
July 24, 2022. The Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark PATANJALI. Based on these claims...per paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2023-09-11 - Case Details
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark; that Respondent has no rights or legitimate...paragraph 4(a) of the Policy have been satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2021-04-16 - Case Details
the second level domain, including and . (b) The Domain Name in Dispute is Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant’s Trademark Complainant...domain name in dispute is confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights. (c) Respondent Has No Rights or Legitimate Interests in...
2006-05-15 - Case Details
Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate...website. Complainant contends that the disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s GRUNDFOS mark. Complainant further contends that the...
2011-11-17 - Case Details
Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name and the trademark WYNN are confusingly similar. The disputed domain name contains WYNN in its...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...
2019-10-01 - Case Details
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered Marks because the disputed domain is composed of the Complainant’s mark...Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is...
2014-12-11 - Case Details
A. Complainant Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark, that Respondent has no...of the elements enumerated in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy have been satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2019-01-08 - Case Details