About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.068 sec)

Rows

<<  <  141 - 160  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2328 for bakkavor-group.com html (7 KB)

A. Complainant Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark, that Respondent has no...of the elements enumerated in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy have been satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...

2019-01-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0818 for lufthansaholidays.com html (9 KB)

’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant’s contentions are equally straightforward and can be summarized as follows. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to its...or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...

2011-07-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1783 for autdesk.com, autodek.com html (12 KB)

names are confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...of . The Complainant refers to a number of UDRP cases in which panels have held such misspellings to be confusingly similar to the trade mark in suit...

2016-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0143 for mbccredit.com html (31 KB)

Solutions, Inc. v. LaPorte Holdings, Inc. , WIPO Case No. D2004-0800 (finding Respondent’s domain name confusingly similar to trademark “ ” and ordering...transfer); Soci�t� des H�tels M�ridien v. LaPorte Holdings, Inc ., WIPO Case No.�D2004-0849 (finding Respondent’s domain name confusingly similar to...

2005-04-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0308 for bellouth.com, bellsoouth.com, bellsoouth.net, bellsouh.com, bellsouh.net, bellsuth.com, bellsuth.net html (18 KB)

similar to its marks because they are common misspellings of BELLSOUTH and virtually identical and confusingly similar to such mark. As a result of the wide...submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems appropriate". A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...

2003-06-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0109 for kate-spade.com html (25 KB)

Complainant asserted the following: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks KATE SPADE. Other panels constituted under the Policy...have found domain names confusingly similar in virtually identical factual situations to those presented in Complainant’s Complaint (and cites the...

2005-06-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0243 for swarovskideschmuck.com html (8 KB)

SWAROVSKI mark, (2) that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the SWAROVSKI mark, (3) that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...of the following: (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and...

2014-05-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0172 for mexana.com html (9 KB)

has registered and used the domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to the MEXSANA family of marks, which Complainant asserts includes its...name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...

2014-04-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1200 for consulting-mazars.com html (8 KB)

domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademark. It observes that the disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant's trademark MAZARS...confusingly similar and is not sufficient to render the disputed domain name distinctive from the Complainant's mark. The Complainant considers that the...

2014-09-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1979 for bolloore.com html (9 KB)

confusingly similar to its trademark BOLLORE and that the duplication of the letter “O” is a typographical error likely to be made by the Internet users. The...Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks. The Complainant also alleges that the addition of a...

2016-11-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1121 for master--card.com html (10 KB)

contends that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark, with simply the insertion of two hyphens. Complainant alleges that...disputed domain name transferred to it, Complainant must show that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...

2007-09-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1743 for f5group.com html (8 KB)

or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name...satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the...

2021-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2902 for somaiogic.com pdf (135 KB)

Domain Name the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith. page 3 A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has documented its ownership of various...

2022-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DSE2018-0047 for chatrouletteens.se html (10 KB)

for CHATROULETTE, No. 008944076, which covers Sweden and contends that it is identical or confusingly similar to the disputed domain name . Furthermore...is confusingly similar to Petitioners' trademark. As such, the Domain Holder has demonstrated a knowledge of and familiarity with the Petitioners...

2018-10-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-1512 for jacrewshop.com, jcrewmaxidress.com html (16 KB)

similar The Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the J. CREW trademark. The distinctive feature of the Disputed...trademark is still considered confusingly similar to the relevant trademark. Moreover, the addition of the generic words “shop” or “maxi dress” does not...

2020-08-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DNL2016-0029 for hollandcasinoonlinespelen.nl html (13 KB)

Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the trademarks of which it is proprietor – as set...Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to its trademarks, as its trademarks – HOLLAND CASINO – are fully incorporated in the Disputed Domain Name...

2016-08-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1095 for edmmunds.com html (13 KB)

2002.   5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complaint can be summarized as follows: (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar – The domain name is...following elements: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. (ii) The...

2006-10-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-0721 for natexes.info html (12 KB)

currently inactive. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant’s contentions can be summarized as follows: Identical or confusingly similar The...respect to the Disputed Domain Name at issue in this case: (i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...

2019-06-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1638 for acter.org, crackacc.com pdf (241 KB)

its registered trade marks. The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark, which they incorporate. The Respondent...the balance of probabilities that: - the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights...

2022-07-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-3276 for netcredil.com pdf (142 KB)

Policy for a transfer of the Disputed Domain Name. Notably, the Complainant contends as follows: - The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the...“Respondent’s use of a confusingly similar variant of NETCREDIT [ie ‘NETCREDIL’] in its domain name registration clearly infringes the Complainant’s rights in...

2024-10-02 - Case Details