names are confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...of . The Complainant refers to a number of UDRP cases in which panels have held such misspellings to be confusingly similar to the trade mark in suit...
2016-10-06 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant’s contentions are equally straightforward and can be summarized as follows. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to its...or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2011-07-15 - Case Details
Solutions, Inc. v. LaPorte Holdings, Inc. , WIPO Case No. D2004-0800 (finding Respondent’s domain name confusingly similar to trademark “ ” and ordering...transfer); Soci�t� des H�tels M�ridien v. LaPorte Holdings, Inc ., WIPO Case No.�D2004-0849 (finding Respondent’s domain name confusingly similar to...
2005-04-21 - Case Details
similar to its marks because they are common misspellings of BELLSOUTH and virtually identical and confusingly similar to such mark. As a result of the wide...submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems appropriate". A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2003-06-13 - Case Details
for CHATROULETTE, No. 008944076, which covers Sweden and contends that it is identical or confusingly similar to the disputed domain name . Furthermore...is confusingly similar to Petitioners' trademark. As such, the Domain Holder has demonstrated a knowledge of and familiarity with the Petitioners...
2018-10-12 - Case Details
Complainant asserted the following: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks KATE SPADE. Other panels constituted under the Policy...have found domain names confusingly similar in virtually identical factual situations to those presented in Complainant’s Complaint (and cites the...
2005-06-01 - Case Details
Domain Name the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...has been registered and is being used in bad faith. page 3 A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has documented its ownership of various...
2022-11-14 - Case Details
confusingly similar to its trademark BOLLORE and that the duplication of the letter “O” is a typographical error likely to be made by the Internet users. The...Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks. The Complainant also alleges that the addition of a...
2016-11-29 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademark. It observes that the disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant's trademark MAZARS...confusingly similar and is not sufficient to render the disputed domain name distinctive from the Complainant's mark. The Complainant considers that the...
2014-09-01 - Case Details
has registered and used the domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to the MEXSANA family of marks, which Complainant asserts includes its...name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2014-04-10 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name...satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the...
2021-08-11 - Case Details
contends that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark, with simply the insertion of two hyphens. Complainant alleges that...disputed domain name transferred to it, Complainant must show that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2007-09-13 - Case Details
SWAROVSKI mark, (2) that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the SWAROVSKI mark, (3) that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...of the following: (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and...
2014-05-09 - Case Details
similar The Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the J. CREW trademark. The distinctive feature of the Disputed...trademark is still considered confusingly similar to the relevant trademark. Moreover, the addition of the generic words “shop” or “maxi dress” does not...
2020-08-12 - Case Details
Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the trademarks of which it is proprietor – as set...Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to its trademarks, as its trademarks – HOLLAND CASINO – are fully incorporated in the Disputed Domain Name...
2016-08-19 - Case Details
currently inactive. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant’s contentions can be summarized as follows: Identical or confusingly similar The...respect to the Disputed Domain Name at issue in this case: (i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...
2019-06-11 - Case Details
2002. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complaint can be summarized as follows: (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar – The domain name is...following elements: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. (ii) The...
2006-10-30 - Case Details
its registered trade marks. The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark, which they incorporate. The Respondent...the balance of probabilities that: - the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2022-07-14 - Case Details
domain name was created on September 12, 2007. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant A.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that as found...Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical to or confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark ZENNI OPTICAL as the only difference is the...
2010-08-10 - Case Details
following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. - the Respondent has no rights...is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...
2022-04-21 - Case Details