Complainant alleges that (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark, (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...Policy, it must be established that (1) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s ELEMIS trademarks, (2) Respondent has...
2023-09-15 - Case Details
is confusingly similar to Complainant’s SMITHFIELD trademarks, (2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and (3...disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent has no rights or...
2023-03-10 - Case Details
Registrar. Summarizing its legal contentions, Complainant alleges that (1) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s...(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent has no...
2023-03-03 - Case Details
acquired in 2014. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the...listed in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy have been satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...
2022-12-09 - Case Details
domain names , , , are confusingly similar to Complainant�s STAPLES mark. 2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the...domain names registered by Respondent are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (2...
2004-03-04 - Case Details
- The disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent on August 9, 2023. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to and completely...transfer of the disputed domain name, if the Complainant proves that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2024-10-08 - Case Details
Complainant The following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; - the Respondent...Disputed Domain Name; and (iii) The Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element...
2020-05-26 - Case Details
signed an undertaking agreeing to transfer the Domain Name to the Complainants and not to use the JAM JAR mark or any mark confusingly similar thereto...per month under the JAM JAR mark. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainants� JAM JAR and JAMJAR.COM trademarks in which the...
2002-10-22 - Case Details
contain misspellings of famous marks may qualify as confusingly similar. Therefore, because the Domain Name is a misspelling of Complainant�s mark and is...intended to confuse and divert Complainant�s customers, the Domain Name registered by Respondent is confusingly similar to Complainant�s mark HOLIDAY INN...
2003-04-22 - Case Details
fraudulent phishing activity. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant says that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar...The first disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s AFFLELOU trade mark as it reproduces it in its entirety and just adds a final...
2021-02-11 - Case Details
Ross-Simons has built up substantial value and goodwill in its ROSS-SIMONS registered mark. The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to...incorporating the Complainant�s registered mark or any confusingly similar variation of that mark. The Respondent�s registration and use of the disputed domain...
2004-03-16 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel f inds that Complainant has rights in the GOOD MYTHICAL MORNING Mark by virtue of its United States trademark...registrations cited above. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s GOOD MYTHICAL MORNING Mark because: Complainant’s Mark is clearly recognizable...
2023-10-30 - Case Details
Complainant submits that the Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s marks, for the following reasons: - Respondent�s...domain name is identical to and confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademark and service mark SUNKIST as well as confusingly similar to Complainant�s...
2001-08-16 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant states the following: a) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the...6467773 for LOGIS since 2007; ii. the Complainant's domain name is confusingly similar to the Disputed Domain Name. The only difference between the...
2013-08-21 - Case Details
disputed domain name, , is confusingly similar to the Complainant's VIRGIN mark. Prior UDRP panels have found that the Complainant has sufficient rights in...and grant to it a transfer of the disputed domain name, , if the Complainant proves that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar...
2017-07-13 - Case Details
Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns two trademark registrations for the mark JAFRA in the United States. The trademark is a...descriptive terms do not alter the fact that the domain name is confusingly similar to the mark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The Respondent has no rights...
2006-08-15 - Case Details
name is confusingly similar to the SHAW� Registrations and the SHAW Marks. The domain name contains the identical SHAW Registrations and the SHAW Marks...conclusion that Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to registrations in which the Complainants have rights. (iv) The domain name is confusingly...
2007-05-03 - Case Details
5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant Respondent's Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's A10 and A10 NETWORKS Marks.... Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's A10 and A10 NETWORKS trademarks because it is a common and obvious...
2018-02-14 - Case Details
Complainant also utilizes many domain names incorporating its mark for business purposes. - The disputed domain names , , and are all confusingly similar to the...United States. The Respondent’s registration of domain names that are confusingly similar to that trademark is evidence that the Respondent was aware of...
2018-07-25 - Case Details
Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks CAFFITALY and CAFFITALY SYSTEM, because the term “caffitaly” is almost...domain name. As a result, Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks and the disputed domain name. With...
2019-02-12 - Case Details