2005. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant A.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that it is the registered owner of the trademark...confusingly similar domain name in dispute incorporating a misspelling of Complainants trademark for its own commercial gain, by diverting Internet browsers...
2007-05-10 - Case Details
not prevent a finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark. Reuters Limited v. Global Net 2000 Inc. , WIPO Case No. D2000-0441...; Arthur Guinness Son & Co. (Dublin) Ltd. v. Steel Vertigogo , WIPO Case No. D2001-0020 . The disputed domain name is also confusingly similar to the INTESA...
2011-04-18 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark MOSHI MONSTERS. The Complainant...disputed domain name. The Respondent is using a confusingly similar domain name to operate a website that profits from “click-through” advertising royalties...
2010-08-31 - Case Details
Complainant’s trademark since December 2009, when it received a cease and desist letter relating to another domain name ( ) confusingly similar to Complainant’s...satisfied in order to prevail: (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2012-02-15 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. (2) The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Complainant’s...domain name should be cancelled or transferred: i. The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2012-07-02 - Case Details
received no reply. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in...confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark because it merely inverts the words in the mark and adds the word “coin”. The Complainant further alleges...
2022-03-24 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel f inds that Complainant has rights in the GOOD MYTHICAL MORNING Mark by virtue of its United States trademark...registrations cited above. The Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s GOOD MYTHICAL MORNING Mark because: Complainant’s Mark is clearly recognizable...
2023-10-30 - Case Details
Ross-Simons has built up substantial value and goodwill in its ROSS-SIMONS registered mark. The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to...incorporating the Complainant�s registered mark or any confusingly similar variation of that mark. The Respondent�s registration and use of the disputed domain...
2004-03-16 - Case Details
fraudulent phishing activity. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant says that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar...The first disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s AFFLELOU trade mark as it reproduces it in its entirety and just adds a final...
2021-02-11 - Case Details
Complainant asserts that: (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its ARCELORMITTAL trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The addition...of the letter “x” and the deletion of the letter “r” is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the...
2023-09-28 - Case Details
Names are confusingly similar to the LEXUS trademark consisting of a combination of LEXUS with the generic terms "MY" and "MAIL." Complainant further...are identical or confusingly similar to LEXUS, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Names, or that Respondent...
2003-10-17 - Case Details
disputed domain name, , is confusingly similar to the Complainant's VIRGIN mark. Prior UDRP panels have found that the Complainant has sufficient rights in...and grant to it a transfer of the disputed domain name, , if the Complainant proves that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar...
2017-07-13 - Case Details
Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. - The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain...Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no...
2019-08-12 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant states the following: a) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the...6467773 for LOGIS since 2007; ii. the Complainant's domain name is confusingly similar to the Disputed Domain Name. The only difference between the...
2013-08-21 - Case Details
Complainant also utilizes many domain names incorporating its mark for business purposes. - The disputed domain names , , and are all confusingly similar to the...United States. The Respondent’s registration of domain names that are confusingly similar to that trademark is evidence that the Respondent was aware of...
2018-07-25 - Case Details
Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks CAFFITALY and CAFFITALY SYSTEM, because the term “caffitaly” is almost...domain name. As a result, Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks and the disputed domain name. With...
2019-02-12 - Case Details
5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant Respondent's Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's A10 and A10 NETWORKS Marks.... Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant's A10 and A10 NETWORKS trademarks because it is a common and obvious...
2018-02-14 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; Founded by John Codman Ropes and John Chipman Gray in 1865, the...domain name is conducted to determine whether they are confusingly similar. Here, the disputed domain name shows a clear resemblance to the Complainant’s...
2019-06-06 - Case Details
Complainant submits that the Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s marks, for the following reasons: - Respondent�s...domain name is identical to and confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademark and service mark SUNKIST as well as confusingly similar to Complainant�s...
2001-08-16 - Case Details
The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the KICKERS trademark. The Complainant notes that the word “bottes” in French translates...Internet users to its website by use of domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s KICKERS trademark. It says the Respondent has unfairly tried to...
2021-07-21 - Case Details