Complainant”. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires a two-fold inquiry, a threshold investigation...into whether a complainant has rights in a trademark, followed by an assessment of whether the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to that...
2022-02-07 - Case Details
- the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s PLAYBOY Mark; - the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...Complainant, the Complainant must prove the following (Policy, paragraph 4(a)): (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...
2021-09-29 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s JUNGLE BOYS Mark. - the Respondent has no rights...three elements in order to prevail in this proceeding: (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to trademarks or service marks in...
2023-10-04 - Case Details
Complainants assert that: (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ registered SPRINGER trademark; (2) the Respondent lacks rights...of registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar or identical to a famous trademark by an entity that has no relationship to that mark is...
2023-04-18 - Case Details
contends that: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ARKEMA Mark as it includes the ARKEMA Mark in its entirety, connected...the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent...
2024-08-09 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (i) Identical or confusingly similar Complainant asserts that its F5 registered trademarks protect its rights in the...marks F5, F5 (and design) and F5 NETWORKS, as well as extending to protect against the confusingly similar marks, such as F5 PROTECT or F5-PROTECT...
2020-10-28 - Case Details
specifically found the YAHOO! mark to be famous ( Yahoo!Inc. v. Buffalo Wu , CA-00-00178-A). - Respondent�s disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and - the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-02-06 - Case Details
contends that is confusingly similar to Dell’s family of DELL marks and domain names, including DELL4ME and , asserting: “If a domain name incorporates a...famous mark in its entirety, ‘it is confusingly similar to that mark despite the addition of other words.’” Complainant contends that Respondent registered...
2005-03-02 - Case Details
Response in this proceeding. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant i. Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant’s Mark Complainant...contends that the Domain Name is practically identical with and confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks, corporate name and domain name. Complainant...
2006-04-20 - Case Details
on May 27, 2009. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the SOCALGAS trademark as it...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...
2012-09-13 - Case Details
the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the CONSUMENTENBOND trademark as it contains the CONSUMENTENBOND trademark in its entirety, with only one...confusingly similar to a trademark or trade name protected under Dutch law in which the complainant has rights, or other name mentioned in article 2.1(a) under...
2012-11-27 - Case Details
or Confusingly Similar The Complainant submits that it owns trademark registrations for the trademarks MAEDA and MAEDA MINI CRANES, including the...Registrations set out in paragraph 4 above. The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's registered...
2014-12-18 - Case Details
entirety Complainant’s TRUSTMARK Mark and Complainant’s domain name. As such, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s TRUSTMARK Mark...domain name; and - The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar In order for Complainant to...
2013-11-13 - Case Details
registration of the Domain Name on January 9, 2009. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the...meet three cumulative conditions: a. the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or trade name protected under Dutch law in which...
2013-10-22 - Case Details
well-known trademark in the Benelux. According to the Complainant, the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Trademark. No rights or legitimate...‘care’ and ‘glass’, results in a total image which is identical or at least confusingly similar to the Trademark, according to the Complainant. B...
2013-09-12 - Case Details
Complainant Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s famous mark, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate...B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2013-08-19 - Case Details
confusingly similar to its well-known SPAR trademarks. According to Complainant Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...
2011-10-17 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the TAMIFLU trademark as it contains the TAMIFLU mark...order that the Domain Name should be transferred: (i) the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2012-02-23 - Case Details
Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the XENICAL trademark as it contains the XENICAL trademark in its entirety. According to...be transferred: (i) the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant...
2012-02-23 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the XENICAL trademark as it contains the XENICAL mark...order that the Domain Name should be transferred: (i) the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2012-02-21 - Case Details