or Confusingly Similar The Complainant submits that it owns trademark registrations for the trademarks MAEDA and MAEDA MINI CRANES, including the...Registrations set out in paragraph 4 above. The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's registered...
2014-12-18 - Case Details
to third-party websites. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant Complainant submits that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the CRUISEWINKEL...Regulations, a claim to transfer a domain name must meet three cumulative conditions: a. the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2016-07-11 - Case Details
confusingly similar to Complainant’s well-known and registered BMW marks because it consist of this mark in its entirety, with the addition of the non...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or trade name protected under Dutch law in which the complainant has rights, or other name...
2016-06-16 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s Trademarks Complainant argues that it is a well...identical (or at least confusingly similar) to the Trademark, as the Domain Name is comprised of the Trademark and the word “financial”, which word is...
2015-12-14 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...have been satisfied: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2023-04-17 - Case Details
active website but was identified by a third party “as a “malicious IP address.” 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant 1. Identical or Confusingly Similar...consisting of Complainant’s mark, plus “-cloud,” which is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark and would lead a reasonable observer to believe that the...
2023-10-19 - Case Details
confusingly similar to their BARRY CALLEBAUT mark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name, and the Domain Name was...Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”) at section 4.11.1). B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2023-09-08 - Case Details
Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; that the Respondent has...have been met in this case. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. WIPO Overview of WIPO...
2024-11-11 - Case Details
specifically found the YAHOO! mark to be famous ( Yahoo!Inc. v. Buffalo Wu , CA-00-00178-A). - Respondent�s disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and - the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-02-06 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; - the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...prove: (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii...
2008-11-13 - Case Details
Similar to Complainant's Mark With respect to this issue, the Complainant asserts that the contested domain name is confusingly similar to its mark since it...Complainant's business and goodwill by attracting consumers through the confusingly similar domain name and by collecting revenue by featuring sponsored links to...
2008-08-29 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns the trademark INDIAN OIL. The Respondent has registered the domain name which...Respondent is using the confusingly similar domain name in association with the operation of a website which provides links to websites of other businesses, of...
2011-02-01 - Case Details
Canada. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns the trademark DEATH ROW RECORDS. The Respondent has...Respondent is using the confusingly similar domain name in association with the operation of a website which provided unauthorized bootleg material for...
2010-12-20 - Case Details
as indisputable. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant alleges that the domain name c ount-harrods.com> is confusingly similar to...distinctive word to the HARRODS trademark and is, consequently, to be considered as confusingly similar. The Complainant claims that the absence of any obvious...
2006-11-15 - Case Details
Response in this proceeding. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant i. Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant’s Mark Complainant...contends that the Domain Name is practically identical with and confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks, corporate name and domain name. Complainant...
2006-04-20 - Case Details
contends that is confusingly similar to Dell’s family of DELL marks and domain names, including DELL4ME and , asserting: “If a domain name incorporates a...famous mark in its entirety, ‘it is confusingly similar to that mark despite the addition of other words.’” Complainant contends that Respondent registered...
2005-03-02 - Case Details
biscuits from 1995. The Complainant owns the domain name . The Domain Name registered in 2018 is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark...Confusingly Similar The Domain Name combines the Complainant’s OREO mark (registered in the United States and Pakistan for food products with first use in 1912...
2018-12-12 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant’s official, legal and world-famous name, its common law marks, and its famous registered AT&T marks. Internet users...Previous WIPO UDRP panels have considered the following domain names containing “ATT” to be confusingly similar to AT&T’s marks and required them to be...
2005-11-22 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The following contentions are summarised from the Complaint. Identical or confusingly similar The Complainant submits that the...disputed domain names are confusingly similar to its registered Yellow Pages trade mark for the purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. The Respondent...
2006-08-11 - Case Details
each of these elements regarding each of the Domain Names: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar To succeed under the first UDRP element, the Complainant is...
2019-10-24 - Case Details