About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 47367   document(s)s (0.085 sec)

Rows

<<  <  361 - 380  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1542 for alstom-projects-share-market.info html (12 KB)

Complaint. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant argues the following: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is the owner of numerous ALSTOM trademarks protected throughout the...

2008-12-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1819 for gotmilkmedia.com html (10 KB)

that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its GOT MILK? trademark in that the Domain Name pairs the mark with the less distinctive term, “media...not give the Respondent the right to adopt a domain name that is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s well-known trademark in order to attract...

2011-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2011-0037 for letsbonus.co html (11 KB)

disputed domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the above-referenced trademarks in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant claims that...the disputed domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the trademarks and legitimate rights of LET´S BONUS, S.L. The Complainant also...

2011-09-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2721 for gaapfactory.com pdf (143 KB)

Domain Name is confusingly similar to its GAP and GAP FACTORY marks, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name, and the...3.0”), section 4.11.1). B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Where the trade mark is recognisable within the domain name, the domain name will normally...

2022-08-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1842 for kempinsi.com pdf (145 KB)

disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainants’ trademark. The Respondent should be considered as having no rights or legitimate interests...with the Rules, that: page 3 (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights...

2022-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-2013 for claimfashionnova.com pdf (142 KB)

confusingly similar to the FASHION NOVA Marks. Complainant contends that the addition of the descriptive terms is a non-material difference that does not lessen...confusion and that the slight variation should still be recognized as confusingly similar and/or virtually identical. Complainant contends that Respondent has...

2022-08-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3897 for gt-laws.com pdf (138 KB)

disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to those rights, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain...reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant alleges: -It has used its...

2024-01-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0257 for gatewaycomputers.com html (9 KB)

Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark "Gateway" and similar marks in which it has rights; that the Respondent has no right or legitimate interest...the Policy, the Complainant must prove: A. that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...

2003-06-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1626 for philipmorrisstocksherholder.com html (9 KB)

disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the common law trademark PHILIP MORRIS. Complainant contends that Respondent has no rights or interests in...registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and, 2) that the...

2016-10-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-0608 for oportuncashloans.com html (9 KB)

Complainant The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its OPORTUN registered trade mark, that the Respondent has no...to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainant must prove that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or...

2017-06-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0218 for dynabraderepair.com html (8 KB)

domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark because it consists of Complainant’s DYNABRADE mark in its entirety, and that the only difference...a domain name, a complainant must demonstrate each of the following: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...

2014-04-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1462 for remy-c0intreau.com html (8 KB)

Contentions A. Complainant The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark REMY COINTREAU. The substitution of the letter "o" by...that contains a common or obvious misspelling of a trademark will normally be found to be confusingly similar to such a trademark where the misspelled...

2017-10-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0220 for rudechalet.com html (9 KB)

alleges, is deliberately “confusingly similar” to Complainant’s registered marks. Specifically, Complainant alleges, with evidence, that Respondent’s...Respondent’s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or...

2007-04-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0866 for merieu.com html (9 KB)

Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant says the Domain Name is nearly identical and confusingly similar to its trademarks, the dominant and distinctive...the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent...

2010-07-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1746 for gecio.com html (8 KB)

confusingly similar to the Complainant’s GEICO mark. The Respondent has no connection with the Complainant and has no consent from the Complainant to use the...a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove that: - The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...

2011-01-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1391 for eroslistings.com html (24 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainants have rights. Complainants state that they have used certain of their registered...demonstrate that the Domain Name and one or more of Complainants’ trademarks are confusingly similar, Complainants argue that the Domain Name must...

2011-11-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3571 for acelormittalx.com pdf (181 KB)

Complainant The Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark ARCELORMITTAL on which the Complainant has prior rights...disputed domain name; and (iii) the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds...

2023-10-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-0736 for olioutdoorservice.com, olitreeservice.com pdf (153 KB)

Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s OLI OUTDOOR SERVICES and OLI TREE CARE Marks. - The Respondents have no rights or...or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondents have no rights or legitimate...

2023-04-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-3822 for theschneiderelectric.com pdf (148 KB)

Complainant The following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC Mark...Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and page 3 (ii) the Respondent...

2022-11-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-0833 for archerdanielsmidlandco.com pdf (160 KB)

is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s corporate name and ADM Mark because the disputed domain name is formed by wholly adopting the Complainant’s...asserts that the disputed domain name is thus confusingly similar to the Complainant’s corporate name and the ADM Mark because the Mark is composed from the...

2022-06-01 - Case Details