The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is identical and/or confusingly similar to its JAEGER-LECOULTRE trademark as it incorporates the...name is confusingly similar to its trademark, due to the Respondent misspelling the trademark JAEGER-LECOULTRE by swapping the letter “e” and “a” in the...
2022-01-12 - Case Details
the Registrar. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant makes the following contentions. Identical or Confusingly Similar First, the...Complainant states that the disputed domain name should be considered as confusingly similar to its prior rights since the disputed domain name wholly...
2022-09-01 - Case Details
i. The disputed domain name is identical/confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark SOUTHORD; ii. There is no evidence that the Respondent...Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar On the evidence adduced by the Complainant and set out in Section 4 above the Panel is satisfied that the...
2022-12-22 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar Complainant states that as found in section 4 above it is the owner of many trademark registrations in the United States for or including...disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s registered trademarks for or including INTUIT as the disputed domain name includes the whole of...
2010-09-21 - Case Details
disputed domain name; and (iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed...prevent the disputed domain name from being confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. See section 1.9 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 . The misspelt...
2021-04-12 - Case Details
Complainant’s website. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds the disputed domain name is confusingly...
2020-03-02 - Case Details
services of the Complainant and the Complainant’s competitors. The Complainant submits that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to the MASTERCARD and...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (2) the respondent has no rights or...
2007-10-19 - Case Details
businesses providing clothing and fashion accessories as a “click-through site”. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar...The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s HOLLISTER CO. trademark (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The...
2007-06-05 - Case Details
namely as a manufacturer of cameras and film. The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...that in assessing whether a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trade mark the domain extension is disregarded. Therefore, the disputed...
2022-06-15 - Case Details
similar to Complainants� marks. Respondent�s Domain Name fully incorporates Complainants� famous CITI Mark, is confusingly similar to Complainants� CITI and...making a protected non-commercial use of the Domain Name. Respondent�s Domain Name is nearly identical and is confusingly similar to the Complainants� CITI...
2003-08-18 - Case Details
and firearm related products and services. 5. Parties� Contentions A. Complainant Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to...confusingly similar under the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. See Medtronic, Inc. v. gotdomains4sale.com , WIPO Case No. D2001-1033...
2004-01-27 - Case Details
months. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant A.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly...confusingly similar nature between the disputed domain name and Complainant's marks. See, Infospace.com, Inc. v. Delighters, Inc. , WIPO Case No. D2000-0068...
2013-02-08 - Case Details
Contentions A. Complainant (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar because the...” America Online, Inc. v. Anson Chan , WIPO Case No. D2001-0004 . A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name incorporates the entirety of...
2009-02-25 - Case Details
Carolina. The Complainant argues that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark and is nearly identical to the Complainant's...Name is confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the Complainant. By registering the Domain Name that incorporates the trademark in its entirety...
2022-02-15 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to an established mark. - The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Complainant...registration and use of a confusingly similar domain name by an unaffiliated entity is a presumptive case of bad faith. Moreover, the Respondent’s bad faith is...
2022-12-29 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the TURBOTAX Trademark because “Respondent is clearly engaged in ‘typosquatting’, whereby a domain name registrant deliberately...that the practice of ‘typosquatting’ results in the creation of domain names confusingly similar to the relevant mark.” Respondent has no rights or...
2020-08-26 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the trademarks held by the Complainant. The disputed domain name differs from BHP Billiton’s BHP BILLITON trademark only in that the...disputed domain name is missing the letter “l”. The combination of the “BHP” element and the misspelt “BILLITON” creates a word that is confusingly similar...
2006-11-15 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which it has rights, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain...Complainant must prove each of the following, namely that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...
2018-04-18 - Case Details
other companies’ goods and services as a “pay-per-click” site. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The...Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ETS and TOEFL Trademarks. The Complainant submits that the disputed domain...
2007-06-06 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark; that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and...disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent has no rights or...
2021-04-28 - Case Details