Complainant's mark, together with a single generic term, it is at least confusingly similar to that mark. The similarity is increased since the generic term...Respondent has no legitimate use for the confusingly similar domain name in question, which was registered more than a decade after the Complainant began using...
2009-08-11 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. Specifically, the Complainant asserts: (1) The domain name adopts the Complainant’s “WSI” name with only the...generic term “company” appended to it. Other UDRP panels have considered similar domain names with generic additions to be confusingly similar and ordered...
2005-03-03 - Case Details
satisfied. In particular, the Complainant asserts that: (1) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to trademarks in which the Complainant has rights...satisfied, as follows: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2023-04-25 - Case Details
domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i), Rules...paragraphs 3(b)(viii), (b)(ix)(1)) There can be no doubt that each of the Respondent’s domain names is confusingly similar to the family of MYXER Marks in...
2008-03-19 - Case Details
countries, and serving 2,500,000 customers each week. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks. The content of the...Complainant, under the Policy the Respondent cannot use a domain name which is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark to do so. This is...
2008-03-03 - Case Details
Respondent's activity falls within the definition of typosquatting. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's mark PARAGONGIFTS.COM (and...Complainant's mark THE PARAGON and thus is confusingly similar to it. (citing Quixtar Investments, Inc. v. Scott A. Smithberger and Quixtar-IBO , WIPO Case No...
2004-04-27 - Case Details
be summarized as follows: The Domain Name is confusingly similar to its trade mark SWAROVSKI in which it clearly has rights. Addition of the non...a) of the Policy, the Complainant must satisfy the Panel that: (i) The Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service...
2012-08-20 - Case Details
activities, Complainant has developed a considerable reputation and goodwill worldwide in both its brands and products. The Domain Name is confusingly similar...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds Complainant has established rights in the RED BULL Mark based on the aforementioned trademark registrations...
2021-06-24 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainants Complainants allege that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainants’ Mark because it essentially...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2020-05-20 - Case Details
Complainant The following are the Complainant’s contentions: - the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. - the Respondent...(i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the...
2022-10-05 - Case Details
registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s incontestable, federally registered trademarks. Complaint para. 51...Complainant offers ample evidence of the strength and famousness of its marks and contend that the Domain Name is confusingly similar in appearance and...
2000-11-27 - Case Details
Complaint are uncontested. 5. The Parties Contentions A. Complainant 5.1 Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant�s...name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and b) the registrant (Respondent) has no rights...
2004-04-16 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. - The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to...disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The mere fact of registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar or identical...
2023-12-21 - Case Details
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar...the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The mere fact of registration of a domain name that is confusingly similar or...
2023-10-30 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, to succeed, Complainant must prove that: (i) the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...in English. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar To satisfy paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, Complainant must show that the disputed domain names are...
2015-06-30 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (Policy, para...Complainant states that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark, as it incorporates the Mark entirely and merely adds the term...
2015-06-18 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant Confusingly Similar The Complainant submits that it owns multiple registrations for the trademark TONY LAMA, including those listed...Complainant’s registered trademark. Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...
2016-02-04 - Case Details
1998, and holds various other domain names that incorporate its INTIMISSIMI mark. (b) The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the...phonetically, visually and conceptually confusingly similar to the Complainant's registered trade mark. The only difference between the Complainant's mark and...
2014-12-03 - Case Details
sale. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that: - The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Mark in which the...prove each of the following to justify the transfer of the Disputed Domain Name: (i) That the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to...
2014-05-08 - Case Details
Complaint. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to trademarks and service marks in...is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2013-11-26 - Case Details