understanding the Policy, Rules, and Supplemental Rules. D. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has shown rights in its PICK ‘N PAY marks by reason of...disputed domain names, , included an exact copy of Complainant's trademark (including images and color) and several other elements similar to those...
2009-03-18 - Case Details
duly registered and owned by the Complainant, is confusingly similar the domain name . In conclusion, the requirement of Paragraph 4.a.(i) is met. " 4.a...the domain name (see Annex 7). 5. Parties� Contentions 5.1 Complainant contends that: a) The domain name is identical and therefore confusingly...
2002-01-31 - Case Details
registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service in which the Complainant has rights; and, (ii) that the Respondent...6.1. Domain name identical or confusingly similar The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of several trademark registrations for CRUZCAMPO...
2002-01-15 - Case Details
Complainant, to obtain the requested remedy, must prove each of the following: (i) that the domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to a...registrations. The question therefore is whether the trademark ABNAMRO is confusingly similar to . Although Complainant has not provided evidence thereof, the...
2002-02-06 - Case Details
the following: -The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the trade mark; -The Respondent has no right or legitimate interest in respect of...applicable rules and principles of law, as directed by paragraph 15(a) of the Rules, it is found: (1)that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the...
2002-05-22 - Case Details
by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2) that the Respondent...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant�s mark FLÜGGER is registered and has been used in many countries in Europe and in particular the resident...
2002-06-03 - Case Details
following (the Policy, paragraphs 4(a)(i-iii)): - the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...used in bad faith Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has exhibited a number of United States trademark and service mark registrations for...
2003-05-12 - Case Details
elements set out in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. These are: (i) Respondent's Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...not automatically result in judgment for the Complainant. 8. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar. The disputed domain names...
2003-04-22 - Case Details
help rendered by the Respondent. 6. Discussion and Findings a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name is confusingly similar to the...conveyed under another domain name than the name in issue or a similar one, avoiding such effects as mentioned, to the trademark, to the Complainants and to...
2003-05-05 - Case Details
requested relief. These elements are that: (i) Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a Trademark or Service Mark in which the...applicability, in detail, of what is stated in paragraph 4 (a) of the Policy. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name in question is identical to all...
2003-10-31 - Case Details
� The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s name and registered trademark, AKG. � The Respondent has no rights or...Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or...
2001-07-13 - Case Details
Findings According to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark...that basis, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights. Rights or legitimate...
2001-07-05 - Case Details
a) of the Policy, the Respondent is required to prove the three following elements: (i) The domain name is identical to or confusingly similar to...confusingly similar to trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights The Complainant submits that the absolute identity between the domain name...
2001-10-18 - Case Details
The Respondent cannot be blamed if the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark. (ii) There is exhibited to the Response a letter dated...prove each of the three elements set out in paragraph 4(a) of the ICANN policy, as follows: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2001-10-29 - Case Details
existence of each of the following elements: 1. The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which theComplainant has...theRespondent. Identical or Confusingly Similar Trademark Under the Singapore Trade Marks Act(Cap 332, 1999 Edition), a trademark (or 'trade mark' as identified...
2001-10-30 - Case Details
Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Name The relevant part of the disputed domain name, namely is identical with the trade- and...prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2001-09-20 - Case Details
has registered a domain name which is confusingly similar to common law marks used by Complainant and in which Complainant claims rights, that...following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...
2001-10-29 - Case Details
registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and � That the Respondent...in bad faith. Domain name is confusingly similar/identical to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights The Complainant has provided evidence of...
2001-10-08 - Case Details
the Respondent's domain name in issue is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights. Given...against the passing off or palming off of similar services, if they were offered by another person under that or a confusingly similar name. It is true that...
2001-12-04 - Case Details
contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its trademark. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...or confusingly similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2001-12-04 - Case Details