23, 2020 regarding the reinstitution of the proceeding. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established...
2020-08-14 - Case Details
Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Once the gTLD “.xyz” is ignored...
2020-01-22 - Case Details
services. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2020-01-03 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established it has rights in the...
2019-12-09 - Case Details
recently registered United Kingdom figurative trademark and its United States trademark applications. The Domain Name is confusingly similar, according to...following: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent...
2019-09-13 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in the trademark 911EYE. The test for confusing similarity involves the comparison...
2019-07-29 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established that it has rights in the trademark AMGEN. The test for confusing similarity involves the comparison between...
2019-07-26 - Case Details
fairer as a whole to render this decision in English. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated with supporting evidence that it...
2009-01-30 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in its mark TAMIFLU by evidencing its trademark registrations. It is a reasonable inference that it...
2007-12-07 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to its registered MEDALLION...
2007-11-07 - Case Details
B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2007-10-04 - Case Details
Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Incorporation in its entirety of a trademark without additions...
2007-10-01 - Case Details
trade show. The mark is used in connection with all the products and services relating to the trade show. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar...registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no...
2007-09-20 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is the owner of an international registration for the trademark with figurative elements CINEMA...
2007-09-14 - Case Details
and all inferences that can reasonably be drawn there from (Rules, paragraph�14(b)). 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2006-06-30 - Case Details
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the...
2006-05-24 - Case Details
that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to ATLAS COPCO in that the only difference is the misspelling in the Domain Name: the addition...
2008-09-22 - Case Details
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s HOLIDAY INN trademarks because it contains Complainant’s trademark plus the descriptive words...
2008-07-25 - Case Details
such offers were refused; and that the domain name was retired per agreement. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel...
2008-05-02 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The domain name at issue is identical with the Complainant's CRAFTSMAN trademarks. The Complainant has thus fulfilled the requirements under...
2008-04-16 - Case Details