The Complainant’s trade mark has been continuously and actively used since 1946.
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark, which it
incorporates in its entirety.
The Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established registered rights in the mark METCO, as well as unregistered trade mark
rights deriving from the Complainant’s use of that mark.
...
2023-01-09 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not formally reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Once the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) extension “.com” is disregarded (which is appropriate in this
case), the disputed domain name consists of the Complainant’s registered word trademark LULULEMON,
followed by the string “likenew”. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark
in which the Complainant has rights
The disputed domain name also consists solely of the Complainant’s registered word trademark
LULULEMON LIKE NEW. ...
2022-12-12 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy states that the Complainant must prove each of the three following elements:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns multiple trademark registrations for the mark BARRY CALLEBAUT prior to the registration of the disputed domain name on October 11, 2021.
...
2022-03-16 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to the Trade
Marks, the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, and
the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith.
...Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
6.3 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2022-03-15 - Case Details
Complainant
According to the Complainant, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its META registered
trademark as it captures the entirety of its trademark with the mere adjunction of the term “coin”.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name reproduces the Complainant’s trademark META in its entirety with no alteration,
and combines this trademark with the term “coin”.
...
2023-02-10 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant essentially contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademarks
for MICHELIN, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain
name, and that the disputed domain name was registered, and is being used in bad faith.
...Based on the evidence and arguments submitted, the Panel’s findings are as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has provided sufficient evidence that it has valid rights in the mark
MICHELIN, based on its use and registration of the same as a trademark.
...
2023-03-20 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Trade Mark, the
page 3
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names, and the disputed
domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith.
...Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration.
...
2023-03-17 - Case Details
In accordance with paragraph 14(a) of the Rules, if the Respondent does not submit a Response, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, the Panel shall decide the dispute based upon the Complaint.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established rights over the WHATSAPP trademark, entirely reproduced in the disputed domain name. ...For the reasons above, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a non-exclusive list of circumstances that may indicate the Respondent’s rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2022-02-21 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy sets forth the following three requirements, which have to be met for this Panel to order the transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant:
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...For the reasons above, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark.
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a non-exclusive list of circumstances that may indicate the Respondent’s rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2022-01-27 - Case Details
The addition of the term “iran” does not alter the fact that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The gTLD “.com” should generally be ignored when assessing confusing similarity as established by prior UDRP decisions.
Consequently, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark of the Complainant and that the Complainant has satisfied paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2022-02-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name incorporates Complainants’ trademark UNIPOL in its entirety. This is sufficient to establish confusing similarity (Magnum Piering, Inc. v. ...D2002-0122).
The Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the UNIPOL mark of Complainants.
Complainants have established Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
...
2021-12-29 - Case Details
As of the date of this decision, the disputed domain name redirects Internet users to different websites displaying seemingly random contents. The disputed domain name was used in a similar way at the time of filing of the Complaint.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant’s arguments can be summarized as follows:
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark as it incorporates the Complainant’s ZIPRECRUITER mark clearly and exactly, only followed by the generic term “login”. ...On the basis of the evidence introduced by the Complainant and in particular with regard to the content of the relevant provisions of the Policy, (paragraphs 4(a), (b), (c)), the Panel concludes as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence submitted by the Complainant, describing the Complainant’s trademark registrations and associated business, the Panel finds that the Complainant owns rights to the trademark ZIPRECRUITER in several jurisdictions.
...
2022-02-23 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its LIVERPOOL FC trademark (the “Mark”), that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, and that the Respondent registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(b) of the Policy.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has uncontested rights in the Mark, both by virtue of its trademark registrations and as a result of the goodwill and reputation acquired through its use of the Mark over very many years. ...
2022-01-04 - Case Details
Complainant
The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s ITECHWORLD trademark or, at the very least,
confusingly similar to it.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...The burden of proof of each element is borne by the Complainant.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence presented, the Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the ITECHWORLD
mark by virtue of its trademark registration.
...
2023-10-09 - Case Details
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules directs the Panel to decide the Complaint on the basis of the statements and
documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that
it deems applicable.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
While the addition of other terms, here “lookup”, may bear on assessment of the second and third elements,
the Panel finds the addition of such term does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the
disputed domain name and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2023-07-24 - Case Details
Based on the evidence and arguments submitted, the Panel’s findings are as follows:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has provided sufficient evidence that it has valid rights in its mark for
ZABASEARCH, based on its use and registration of the same as a trademark, as stated above.
Further, as to whether the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar with the Complainant’s
ZABASEARCH mark, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name consists of only one element, namely
the Complainant’s ZABASEARCH trademark followed by the country code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD) “.co”.
...
2023-06-06 - Case Details
Under paragraph 15(a) of the Rules, “[a] Panel shall decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and
documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that
it deems applicable”.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has provided evidence establishing that it has trademark rights in the LA MACHINE DU
MOULIN ROUGE mark through registration in France. ...Moreover, UDRP panels have
consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar
(particularly domain names comprising typos) to a famous or widely-known trademark by an unaffiliated
entity, as in this case, can by itself create a presumption of bad faith on the part of Respondent. ...
2023-05-31 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has proved its rights over the AXA and AXA XL trademarks. The disputed domain name
consists of the AXA XL trademark in its entirety, in addition to the country-code Top-Level Domain (“ccTLD”)
“.co”. ...The ccTLD is typically ignored when assessing whether a domain name is identical or confusing similar to a
trademark. See section 1.11 of the WIPO Overview 3.0.
This Panel concludes that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
trademarks and therefore finds that the requirement of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy is satisfied.
...
2023-04-28 - Case Details
Further, according to paragraph 14(b) of the Rules, the Panel may draw such inferences from Respondent's
failure to submit a Response as it considers appropriate.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.2.1
The Panel finds the entirety of the trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO
Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
...
2023-06-19 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the trademark LKQ through registration and use
demonstrated in the record. The Panel also concludes that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to
page 4
that mark. The additional number “1” in the Domain Names does not alter the fact that the LKQ mark
remains clearly recognizable within the Domain Names.
...
2023-09-06 - Case Details