About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 47367   document(s)s (0.198 sec)

Rows

<<  <  46321 - 46340  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1308 for barça.com html (34 KB)

disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no...is no exceptional circumstance to allow it. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is the owner of several trademark registrations for...

2017-10-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0861 for divex.com html (35 KB)

which ZJ has been found to have registered domain names in bad faith. Using a domain name identical to Divex and confusingly similar to DivX evidences...of bad faith.   7. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Except for the top level domain identifier “.com” the disputed domain...

2007-09-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1574 for liat.com html (28 KB)

is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (para. 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no...Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.5 The Panel, of course, accepts the Complainant’s contention that common law rights in a name or “unregistered trademarks...

2007-03-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0692 for earlylearningcentre.com html (32 KB)

Rules. Under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant carries the burden of proving: (i) That the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has clearly proved this part of the Complaint. It is the registered proprietor of the mark in a number of...

2005-08-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3129 for luma.com html (31 KB)

is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no rights or...addresses those issues. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The first element of a UDRP complaint “functions primarily as a standing...

2022-01-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1056 for blackrivercaviar.com html (33 KB)

balance of probabilities that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights; - the...to the US Case are not the same as those in this proceeding. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in the mark...

2021-06-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1387 for fanuc-repairs.repair, fanuc-spares.com, fanucspares.com html (30 KB)

domain names are being named in the amended Complaint, the Panel considers them collectively as the "Respondent". B. Identical or Confusingly Similar...impression of association of the disputed domain names with such mark. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to...

2015-12-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0001 for patbenatar.com html (35 KB)

respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no...of the aforesaid three elements must be proved by a complainant to warrant relief. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has submitted...

2004-04-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2022-0040 for amadeus.co pdf (238 KB)

name that is identical or confusingly similar to a famous or widely-known trademark can by itself create a presumption of bad faith. The Complainant says...is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...

2022-08-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1981 for ceat.com html (53 KB)

Complainant The Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks and service marks in which it claims to...is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2. The Respondent has no rights or...

2012-03-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0097 for yellowstoneclub.net html (62 KB)

confusingly similar to these marks, as the addition of the definite article “the” does not obviate confusion. Nor does the addition of “scandal” in the third...evidence, to demonstrate each of the following Policy elements: (i) the disputed domain name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to...

2013-05-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DAU2016-0033 for actrangerover.com.au, adelaidejaguar.com.au, adelaiderangerover.com.au, albanyjaguar.com.au, albanyrangerover.com.au, alexandriajaguar.com.au, alexandriarangerover.com.au, alicespringslandrover.com.au, alicespringsrangerover.com.au, artarmonlandrover.com.au ... html (81 KB)

that each of the disputed domain names is confusingly similar to the names and trade marks in which it has rights. In each case, the disputed domain name...known mark in its entirety, together with a geographic term or a descriptive term in a domain name, creates a domain name that is confusingly similar to...

2016-11-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2241 for ktg.com html (50 KB)

””. The Complainant says that the disputed domain name is identical and confusingly similar to its KTG trademark and to the domain name which points to its...value. The Respondent says that the disputed domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Respondent has rights. The...

2018-02-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1922 for center44.com, center44.net html (63 KB)

that the disputed domain names and are identical or confusingly similar to the CENTER44 mark. The Complainants dispute that the Respondent has rights or...or transferred: (i) The domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...

2008-03-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0093 for trademe.com html (72 KB)

names that are identical or confusingly similar to “others” must be observed, which the Respondent here has not demonstrated: Balgow Finance S.A., Fortuna...decision that a domain name should be either cancelled or transferred: (i) The domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...

2009-04-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1463 for solarpowercentre.com html (75 KB)

is confusingly similar to a trade mark in which it owns rights; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name...Complainant’s goodwill and reputation in its trading name. B. Respondent The Respondent contends that the disputed domain name is not confusingly similar to the...

2012-10-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2022-1331 for lego.green pdf (164 KB)

Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns registered trade mark...

2022-06-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-1040 for geico.health pdf (74 KB)

the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated it owns registered...

2023-05-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1684 for monstertemplates.com, monstretemplates.com, templatemonsters.com, templatemonstres.com, templatestunning.com, templatetuner.com, templatetunning.com html (53 KB)

another pattern of bad faith by Respondent. Respondent engaged in bad faith by acquiring, without authorization, the confusingly similar domain names...under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or...

2010-02-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2001-0744 for uni-konstanz.com html (13 KB)

the following: "(i) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...

2001-10-30 - Case Details