identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and - That the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...Complainant asserts that the domain name is essentially identical or is confusing similar to the eStructure mark in which it claims common law trademark rights...
2002-02-14 - Case Details
or her business, the remedy is generally directed to the impugned use of the relevant mark and marks otherwise identical or confusingly similar to the...elements of a justified complaint in respect of a domain name are as follows: “1.1.1 a domain name is identical or misleadingly similar to a Protected...
2013-08-28 - Case Details
terms to a distinctive trademark, the domain name should be considered confusingly similar to the registered trademark ".);Ver también Bayer...incluyó la "Red Turística de Pueblos Patrimonio de Colombia" en su directorio de instituciones. 5. El nombre de dominio en disputa es confusamente similar...
2017-07-14 - Case Details
trademark for ESPIRITO SANTO and the countries of such registrations. 6. The Parties Contentions 6.1 The Complainant 6.1.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar...whether or not the use to which Respondent put the AIM name in its AIMSTER domain name is confusingly similar and whether or not it is a fair or nominative...
2002-02-04 - Case Details
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7. While the addition of other terms...has not used it”. B. Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly...
2023-10-19 - Case Details
and to identify Complainant�s products on the Internet. The Complainant asserts that: (1) the domain name "libro.com" is confusingly similar to the...that each of the following three elements is present: (1) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2000-05-19 - Case Details
Complainant. The Complaint asserts that the domain name in dispute "mcgraw-hill.org" is identical and confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademark MCGRAW-HILL...Respondent be required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding: (i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s...
2000-11-21 - Case Details
elements is present: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name fully incorporates the Complainant’s ENBW Marks and is identical to such marks. It is...
2012-06-14 - Case Details
each of the following: “(i) the domain name is confusingly similar to trademark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no...or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established that it is the owner of a number of DETRALEX trademarks registered worldwide, including Romania...
2014-07-07 - Case Details
is confusingly similar to the registered Trademark of the Complainant and the first criterion has been met. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests The Panel...because the registrant would not have contemplated the complainant’s then non-existent right.” 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly...
2016-11-10 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant (i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s MICHELIN trade mark. The disputed domain name...would be appropriate for English to be the language of the proceeding. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the...
2017-07-06 - Case Details
translation of the evidence submitted in Spanish, in order to ensure this proceeding takes place with due expedition. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar As the...confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy. See section 1.7, WIPO Overview 3.0 . The Complainant indisputably has rights in the registered...
2021-08-20 - Case Details
Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...name; and (iii) that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As highlighted...
2021-03-15 - Case Details
following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii...they will not be identical or confusingly similar to existing third party trademarks. Where registered trademarks are concerned, it is not a matter of...
2010-04-01 - Case Details
the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has...bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar On this topic, the Complainant first cites its rights in the registered trademarks noted in the Factual...
2012-12-04 - Case Details
the suffix “.ie”. Therefore it is clear that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark WHAT CAR...Complainant Identical or Misleadingly Similar The WHAT CAR? mark has become extremely well known, and has developed a significant international reputation and...
2008-02-05 - Case Details
” in a prominent and potentially confusing manner, with the font used for the words “Lonely Planet Exchange” being confusingly similar to the font used...Complainant 1. The domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s extensive portfolio of LONELY PLANET trademarks. The addition of the non-distinctive...
2004-11-03 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate its rights in the Trade Mark acquired...
2023-03-22 - Case Details
each of the following elements: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name, trademark or service mark in which the...been registered or subsequently used in bad faith. The burden of proof of each element is borne by the Complainant. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2022-09-09 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...is borne by the Complainant. page 4 A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Based on the evidence presented of a trademark registration, the Panel finds...
2022-09-06 - Case Details