the following to obtain the transfer of a domain name: (1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...whether the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark WARM THINGS. A simple comparison of the trademark to the domain name makes it...
2002-04-23 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect...of the Domain Name; and (iii) The Domain Name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is...
2002-05-23 - Case Details
each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...mark COLES MYER and the domain name to be confusingly similar to the Second Complainant�s trade marks @MYER, //MYER@, MYER@ and MYER (logo). Each...
2002-05-28 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar to the Complainant�s Trademark "CONVERGYS", which is a coined word having no meaning apart from its use as the Complainant�s trademark. The...domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights...
2002-05-08 - Case Details
or substantiate any assertions made in the Complaint. 6.1 Domain Name identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s trade marks The Disputed Domain...law trademark. The Panel is satisfied that the Disputed Domain is confusingly similar if not identical to trademarks in which the Complainant has rights...
2002-05-14 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainant must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which...Panel is entitled to draw such inferences as it considers appropriate (Rule 14(b)). Identical or confusingly similar The Domain Name and the Complainant�s...
2002-04-17 - Case Details
Findings According to paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, the Complainants must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...(iii) The Domain Name has been registered in bad faith and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar POWERGEN is a registered trade...
2004-05-19 - Case Details
three elements is present: A) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and...being used in bad faith." A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Ignoring, as the Panel is entitled to do, the generic ".com" Top Level Domain, the Domain...
2004-05-19 - Case Details
consider in detail each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a): "(i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...that he has acquired a confusingly similar domain name which he intends to use in competition with the trademark owner, has no rights or legitimate...
2001-01-24 - Case Details
domain name holder�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights ("Element (i...after the complainant has proven that the above-listed elements are present. Element (i) - Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to the Mark The...
2001-05-10 - Case Details
. Complainant indicates that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to marks in which it has rights. Complainant states that Respondent...s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no...
2001-05-31 - Case Details
Respondent. Furthermore, the Complainant submits that because the domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the distinctive trade marks of the...confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade marks. The Complainant has submitted evidence of use of said trade marks in many jurisdictions throughout the...
2000-06-08 - Case Details
the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and...Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to the ACRYLITE trademarks, differing only in the addition of the .com suffix. "The top level domain designator...
2000-06-21 - Case Details
elements are set forth in Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy: - that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...evidence shows that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s WJFK trademark, differing only in the...
2000-06-27 - Case Details
forth in the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Paragraph 4(a), namely (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark...confusingly similar to the trademark of Complainant, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in such domain name, and that the domain name in...
2000-10-02 - Case Details
prevail in this proceeding: 1. That the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. First, the Complainant has established that it has rights...
2000-09-10 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights; and ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain...these three elements are present." 6.3 Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant claims rights in OGAAN. It has filed a number of applications in...
2000-08-28 - Case Details
registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) That the...Respondent in bad faith. Identical or Confusingly Similar to Trademark The Panel finds that the Complainant does have registered trade marks for WOMAD and...
2000-11-16 - Case Details
the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (ii) that the Respondent has...or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. The Panel notes that the entire mark "RECALCINE" is included...
2001-05-10 - Case Details
show: - That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...bad faith. 7. Decision For the foregoing reasons, the Panel decides: a) That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly...
2001-03-19 - Case Details