contends, inter alia , the following: - The domain name bancochile.net is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademarks Banco de Chile. It...is also identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's legal name and trading name Banco de Chile, which Complainant has been using since 1893...
2001-07-25 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark in which it has rights. Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...domain name registration and use, and to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2001-08-03 - Case Details
name is confusingly similar to the SAMI trademark. With respect to whether Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, Complainant...of the domain name , Complainant must prove: - that Complainant has rights in the mark SAMI; - that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar...
2001-08-16 - Case Details
interface at the site. 5. Parties� Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Name The DONNA trademark has acquired renown and...Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights: and...
2001-10-16 - Case Details
intended to refer to CARTASI, and are confusingly similar". The Complaint contends that it had prior common law rights in the trademark CARTASI. The...or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-10-05 - Case Details
confusingly similar to its trade mark kalahari.net. The Complainant also asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in respect of the...identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-11-06 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings Our inquiry focuses on three issues: (1) are the Domain Names confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant...matter. The Domain Names at issue may very well be confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademarks, but absent proof of Complainant�s protectable rights in...
2001-10-25 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the ICANN Policy, namely: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant...and is being used in bad faith. The onus of proving these elements is on the Complainant. 6.1 Identical or Confusingly Similar to a Trademark or Service...
2001-10-17 - Case Details
Complainant under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is to prove: (i) that the Domain Name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark.../amc/en/domains/search/overview/ ). 3 A. Identical or Confusingly Similar There can be no question but that the Domain Name is identical to Complainant’s...
2005-04-05 - Case Details
that each of the following three elements is present: A) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...Confusingly Similar a) The Panel finds that the Complainant has established that it has trademark rights in the word ADATEST in the European Union (EU). The...
2005-01-14 - Case Details
Complainant must prove that: (i) the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established that it has rights in numerous...
2004-11-05 - Case Details
(i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that...Name is Identical or Confusingly Similar to the Complainant’s Trademarks: The Complainant does not base its complaint on a registered trademark. It...
2004-10-21 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, Complainant must show that: i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...confusingly similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights. It is not required that the complainant be the registered owner of the trademark at...
2002-07-11 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no legitimate interest in...in the context of a consideration of the requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is clear that the...
2002-07-31 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainants has rights; and ii) The Respondent has no rights or...identical to the Complainants�s trademarks and tradenames or otherwise confusingly similar therewith. Lack of rights or legitimate interest of the Respondent...
2002-06-05 - Case Details
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires the Complainant to prove that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a service mark in which the...of this dispute takes place in the context of a consideration of the requirements of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2002-08-06 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to the CHOICE trademark, service mark and trade name in which Complainant has rights; the Respondent has no known rights and...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...
2002-08-06 - Case Details
following: (i) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service in which the Complainant has...registered and is being used in bad faith. 6.3. Domain name identical or confusingly similar It is evident that the Complainant�s trademark and the disputed...
2002-12-30 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and ii. the Respondent has no rights or...applicable. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As explained in paragraph 1.2 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second...
2015-10-05 - Case Details
has established each of the three elements required therein. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has alleged unregistered rights in the term...domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's registered trademark. The addition of the generic top-level domain identifier (gTLD) “.com” is not...
2013-02-14 - Case Details