Matters A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy requires the Complainant to show that the disputed domain name is identical or...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. A registered trademark provides a clear indication that the rights in...
2017-01-16 - Case Details
Complainant. 5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends, firstly, that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its AVX trade...English be applied as the language of the proceeding. 6.2 Substantive Matters A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established it has...
2017-01-03 - Case Details
the present case the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the complainant’s trademark, previous panels have ruled that “a likelihood of...Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar By submitting printouts of its trademark registrations in Qatar, Complainant has shown to the satisfaction of...
2016-12-06 - Case Details
Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or...which the Respondent did not reply, are summarized in section 5D, above. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence of...
2016-09-21 - Case Details
follows: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark. It wholly incorporates the Complainant’s trade mark. The addition...website and aims to continue to do so. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns registered trade marks for...
2016-08-25 - Case Details
nevertheless the Panel will examine both of these issues in order to reach its decision in the present ADR proceeding. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar to a...decision granting the remedy requested by the Complainant if the latter proves in the ADR preceding that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly...
2017-12-15 - Case Details
Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to the Trade Mark; the Respondent has no rights or...elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Respondent correctly points out that a trade mark...
2018-08-08 - Case Details
Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant, in all its group...the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly...
2018-08-02 - Case Details
the following to justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...(iii) the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has submitted...
2018-07-27 - Case Details
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The Respondent has no...Confusingly Similar The Complainant has founded its case on common law rights in the name RoofPro, which it has used as a business name since 2004. The Policy...
2018-07-20 - Case Details
established grounds to support an order transferring the Domain Name. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant asserts it is the owner of a Mexican trade...the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s FAMA Mark. Accordingly, the Panel is satisfied that the first element of the Policy...
2018-07-03 - Case Details
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trade mark. The Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed...case. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in the distinctive term "Draftcoin" by virtue of its unregistered trade...
2018-06-08 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...Domain Name; and (iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel concludes that...
2018-05-31 - Case Details
decides that there will be no further consideration given to the Supplemental Filings by the Parties. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant...assessing confusion similarity as in the present case. The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the well-known BAYER Trademarks...
2018-05-07 - Case Details
name, by incorporating the Complainant’s trademark, is confusingly similar to the trademark. The additional generic word “studios” in the disputed domain...the proceeding shall be English. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has held at least one registered...
2017-08-31 - Case Details
each of the following: (i) that the Disputed Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...Disputed Domain Name, but the Complainant later concedes that “[the] Respondent registered the disputed domain name in 2005.” A. Identical or Confusingly...
2017-08-18 - Case Details
visually, phonetically and conceptually confusingly similar to the Complainant’s well-known trade mark STATOIL. As the disputed domain name incorporates the...the proceeding to be in English. The Panel therefore makes a determination accordingly. 6.2 Substantive Issues A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2017-08-14 - Case Details
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the.... B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s SKYERZ mark, 1 in which the...
2017-08-08 - Case Details
(i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the...used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided convincing evidence of its rights in the IQOS trademark acquired...
2017-08-02 - Case Details
cancelled or transferred: (i) the disputed domain names registered by Respondent are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...the relevant provisions of the Policy (paragraphs 4(a) - (c)), the Panel concludes as follows: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that...
2018-04-10 - Case Details