circumstances entitle the Complainants to bring this Complaint against the Respondent. 6.2. Substantive Matters A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel is...
2018-10-12 - Case Details
domain name was registered in April 2002. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in the mark...
2018-10-02 - Case Details
the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established rights in the mark ASIANET...
2018-10-02 - Case Details
disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a...
2020-09-09 - Case Details
demonstrate each of the following: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name, trade mark or service mark in which the...Identical or Confusingly Similar The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical with, or confusingly...
2019-06-20 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant owns numerous trade mark registrations for its CONTIKI trade mark...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
B11(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2023-12-27 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member...
2023-12-21 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in...
2023-11-16 - Case Details
older unregistered distinctive signs against confusingly similar signs. This protection is based on priority of use. The Claimant submitted invoices from...
2023-11-09 - Case Details
each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant...
2024-01-10 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As is explained in section 1.3 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third...
2021-02-24 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated its ownership of various registrations covering the OANDA...
2021-01-25 - Case Details
that: The disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2021-08-13 - Case Details
of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights...
2021-07-26 - Case Details
/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in...
2021-07-06 - Case Details
d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a...
2021-07-01 - Case Details
additional submission into account. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the DENTSPA trademark of...
2021-06-10 - Case Details
874/2004 and Article B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2021-06-02 - Case Details