https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
page 4
Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its NEURON
mark. The Complainant claims common law protection for that mark as part of its domain name from
February 2019, as well as the March 24, 2020, United States registration of the mark. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-12-09 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-01-14 - Case Details
In
view of the Panel, the Complainant has established sufficient evidence in its favor in the case at hand.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-12-26 - Case Details
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules directs the Panel to decide the Complaint on the basis of the statements and
documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that
the Panel deems applicable.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element that the Complainant must establish is that the disputed domain name is identical with, or
confusingly similar to, the Complainant’s name, trade mark or service mark.
...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade
mark and the Complainant has established the first requirement under the Policy.
...
2024-12-23 - Case Details
The Panel finds the ARCELOR trademark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the ARCELOR trademark for the purposes of the Policy.
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-12-19 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the
Complainant’s well known and registered AMERICAN AIRLINES, US AIRWAYS, and USAIR marks. ...International Electronic Communications Inc., WIPO Case No. D2000-0270.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s AMERICAN,
AMERICAN AIRLINES, USAIR, and US AIRWAYS marks, in which the Complainant has established rights
through registration and use. ...
2022-09-20 - Case Details
Complainant
In summary, the Complainant contends as follows:
Identical or confusingly similar
The generic Top-Level domain “.com” is of no distinguishing effect and must be removed from the analysis.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The first element analysis under the Policy is usually conducted in two parts. First, the Panel ascertains
whether the Complainant has UDRP-relevant rights in a trademark, which may be registered or unregistered.
...
2022-09-15 - Case Details
The Panel will therefore deal with each of these requirements.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
To prove this element, the Complainant must first establish that there is a trademark or service mark in which it has rights. ...Previous UDRP panels have consistently found that the mere registration of a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar (particularly domain names comprising typos or incorporating the mark plus a descriptive term) to a widely known trademark by an unaffiliated entity can by itself create a presumption of bad faith.
...
2021-08-05 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant asserts that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its registered CISCO trademarks and that the Respondent has never had permission to use the mark in the Domain Name or other rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name.
...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered CISCO trademarks and concludes that the Complaint satisfies the first element of the Policy.
...
2021-08-16 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant relies on the European Union trademark registration No. 002211159 for, filed on April 17, 2001 and registered on February 28, 2014, in international classes 16, 39, 41, and 42.
...Therefore, the Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2021-08-27 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has adduced uncontested convincing evidence that it has rights in the IQOS and HEETS trademarks and service marks thought its ownership of the portfolio of international trademark registrations to which it refers.
...This Panel finds therefore that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights and the Complainant has succeeded in the first element of the test in Policy 4(a)(i).
...
2021-08-24 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s WHATSAPP trademark.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence submitted, the Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the WHATSAPP mark.
...
2021-07-16 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ACCOR trademark.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Based on the evidence presented, the Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the ACCOR mark.
...
2022-01-17 - Case Details
Notably, the Complainant contends that:
(a) The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s Trademark. The Disputed
Domain Name incorporates the Complainant's Trademark in its entirety. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2024-08-19 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s
VIRGIN trademark. For the Complainant, the additional components “livechat” and “supportchat” refer to
online real-time communication platforms used to interact with customers or website visitors. ...Respondents
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-08-16 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...The generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) extension (“.com”), as a standard requirement of domain name
registration, may be disregarded in the assessment of identity or confusing similarity.
Accordingly, the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Trademarks for the purposes of the
Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.
...
2024-08-12 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established that the disputed domain name is
confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark and the requirement under the first limb of the Policy is
satisfied.
...Factual Background
5. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-08-27 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2024-09-03 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
Under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, to succeed Complainant must satisfy the Panel that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Therefore, Respondent was aware of the TRIVAGO trademarks when it registered the Domain Name, knew,
or should have known that the Domain Name was confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademarks. See
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.2.2; see also TTT Moneycorp Limited v. ...
2025-05-19 - Case Details
Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its famous
trademark, as it comprises the LEGO mark adding the word “products”, which increases the confusing
similarity, and the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com”, which has no relevance in the confusing
similarity test. ...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2025-05-16 - Case Details