the ICANN Policy, is to show: - That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...
2002-03-06 - Case Details
Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2002-03-18 - Case Details
confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademarks and service marks, in which Complainant has prior and superior rights." "Based on the foregoing, Complainant...s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) Respondent has no...
2002-04-17 - Case Details
set out in paragraph 4(a) of the ICANN Policy, as follows: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...
2002-05-10 - Case Details
under paragraph 4(a) of the ICANN Policy, is to show: - That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2002-04-16 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2002-06-25 - Case Details
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, be satisfied: (i) that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2000-05-08 - Case Details
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy provides that the complainant must prove each of the following: 1) that the domain name registered is identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and 2) that the registrant of the domain name at issue has no rights or...
2000-05-23 - Case Details
follows:- · the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and · the Respondent has...
2000-06-07 - Case Details
Under paragraph 4 (a) of the Policy, the Panel should be satisfied that: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2000-06-16 - Case Details
Complainant�s Web site. 5. Parties' Contentions 5. 1 Complainant contends that: a) The domain name is identical, and therefore confusingly similar to the...
2000-06-06 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark "SHOPNET". 5.4 The Respondent has no right or legitimate interest in the domain name...
2000-08-02 - Case Details
Complainant contends that: a) The domain names "somlivre.net" and "somlivre.org" are identical, and therefore confusingly similar to the trademark SOM LIVRE...
2000-10-25 - Case Details
Complainant must prove each of the following: (1) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2000-11-20 - Case Details
S.A. v. Antonio Llanos). 6.2 Fulfilling of the requirement according to the Policy, Paragraph 4 a) 6.2.1 Domain name identical or confusingly similar to...
2000-11-08 - Case Details
5. Parties' Contentions Complainant contends that: (1) The domain name is identical, and therefore confusingly similar to Complainant�s IBOPE mark...
2000-10-23 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a service mark to which the Complainant has rights; b) the Respondent has no legitimate interest in...
2000-11-16 - Case Details
the following: 1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...
2000-12-11 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2001-01-04 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to the trademark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (2) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2001-02-28 - Case Details