the problem of cybersquatting - that is, the registration of domain names consisting of, including, or confusingly similar to marks belonging to another...reproduce en su totalidad la marca POLAREA del Promovente. El nombre de dominio en disputa es idéntico al signo distintivo POLAREA y similar en grado de...
2014-07-28 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainants have rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or...decision. D. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.24 One of the Complainants is clearly the owner of a number of trade marks that comprise the words “Park...
2014-02-21 - Case Details
Name is identical to its PURVA mark and confusingly similar to its PURAVANKARA and PURVANKARA marks. The Complainant contends that it is inconceivable...must prove each of the following, namely that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...
2013-04-10 - Case Details
“foodcube”, and the Complainant's business is confusingly similar to that operated by the proprietor of the website at “www.foodcube.com.au.” 7. The...(i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) That...
2009-09-22 - Case Details
within the meaning of paragraph 4 of the Policy, the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark ISCRUB, that...the Policy, that: A. The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and B. The...
2007-10-24 - Case Details
The Complainant contends: 1. The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...of the Policy, a complainant has the burden of proving the following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2011-06-23 - Case Details
4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in...or Confusingly Similar 6.7 This aspect of the case is very straight forward. The Complainant is clearly the owner of various registered trade mark...
2009-04-08 - Case Details
contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is known by the corporate name, trade name and trademark WIPRO since...
2018-10-29 - Case Details
be conducted in English B. Identical or Confusingly Similar According to section 1.11.1 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP...
2021-02-18 - Case Details
abuse of the sort disallowed by the Policy. 7. Decision The Panel has found that both domain names at issue are confusingly similar to Complainant�s...similar to the extent of creating confusion in respect of the trademarks or service marks on which the complainant holds rights; that Respondent has no...
2001-03-09 - Case Details
domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the Department of Commerce has rights, and 2. Respondents have no rights or legitimate...confusingly similar to" its registered service mark. The Department of Commerce asserts "Respondent has used the disputed domains to provide domain name...
2001-01-26 - Case Details
trademark, yet registers a confusingly similar domain name, the respondent cannot be said to have a legitimate interest in the domain name (citing Charles...and use. B. Respondent The Respondent contends: (i) The Domain Name is not identical or confusingly similar to any relevant trademark owned by the...
2010-08-03 - Case Details
proceeding is ongoing and the domain name is on lock status. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As indicated in the statement of facts, for the purpose of...the Complainant actually owns and uses a very similar domain name for these purposes, under a different gTLD: . Besides, the Respondent himself has...
2018-09-14 - Case Details
prove each of the following to justify the transfer of the disputed domain name: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...evidence attached to them. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided evidence for its rights in the CRYOMEC trademark. The Respondent...
2017-06-27 - Case Details
prove the following: a) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...disputed domain names and are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights; the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate...
2001-04-05 - Case Details
since the inception of its business in 1962. The domain name in issue is identical to the COSMOS mark and confusingly similar to the COSMOS TOURAMA mark...that the domain name in issue is confusingly similar to the Complainant's COSMOS TOURAMA mark. Confusingly Similar 5.9 However, the Respondent admits...
2001-10-22 - Case Details
confusingly similar, or otherwise wholly incorporates the relevant trademark” should apply to this case. Ibid . 3. The Complainant cites cases 4 that it claims...names and is thus obviously confusing similar. The mark is distinctive and the Respondent, a former employee, selected the disputed domain name for its...
2015-04-23 - Case Details
following, namely that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii...litigation takes. Instead, the Panel believes that it will be more appropriate to follow the course taken in a number of similar cases, namely to terminate...
2015-01-21 - Case Details
Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the...estimación de una demanda contenidos en el artículo 4.a) de la Política son: - que el nombre de dominio sea idéntico o similar hasta el punto de crear...
2015-07-29 - Case Details
now proceeds to address the Complaint and Response as follows. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant asserts that...mark rights the Panel accepts that Complainant’s Trade Mark is identified with Complainant and that an unrelated entity or person using a similar domain...
2015-07-08 - Case Details