to each domain name in issue, each of the following: (i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to the corresponding Nabisco...
2000-02-23 - Case Details
that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights...
2001-04-12 - Case Details
prove each element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, namely: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service...
2002-11-19 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainants have rights; (2) that Respondent has no legitimate interests...
2002-04-15 - Case Details
are satisfied, namely that 1. the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which complainant has rights; and 2...
2001-06-12 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) That the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2001-06-20 - Case Details
contends that the contested domain name is identical and confusingly similar to the Complainant's Marks inasmuch as that name includes the Complainant's mark...
2002-04-22 - Case Details
research under the general powers of the Panel articulated, inter alia, in paragraph 10 of the Rules. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant...
2023-04-05 - Case Details
requests that the Panel make a finding of reverse domain name hijacking. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has...
2017-07-10 - Case Details
Uniform Policy. These premises are: - the domain name registered by the respondent must be identical or confusingly similar to an earlier product or service...
2000-09-06 - Case Details
Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and 2. that the Respondent has no rights...
2001-01-22 - Case Details
that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights...
2000-12-27 - Case Details
B.Respondent There has been no valid response from the Respondent. 6. Discussion and Finding A. The domain names at issue are confusingly similar to trade...
2002-06-06 - Case Details
following: (i) that the domain names registered by the Respondent are identical or confusingly similar to the trademarks or service marks in which the...
2002-03-01 - Case Details
issue is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark or service mark, and (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...
2000-08-08 - Case Details
the Policy, is to show: -That the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...
2002-05-10 - Case Details
reverse domain name hijacking by filing the Complaint. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant contends it has (common...
2023-05-08 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration. The fact that the disputed domain...
2023-06-21 - Case Details
inter alia, in paragraph 10 of the Rules. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights in the MONSTER ENERGY mark by virtue of its...
2022-10-27 - Case Details
Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of...
2022-05-04 - Case Details