Identical or Confusingly Similar page 5 The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration. Disregarding...
2022-04-12 - Case Details
”). page 3 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends as follows: Identical or confusingly similar The Complainant is the owner of the...
2022-05-19 - Case Details
the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has...
2023-02-24 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or...
2023-04-05 - Case Details
prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the...
2023-09-04 - Case Details
domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member...
2023-09-22 - Case Details
Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized...
2023-08-29 - Case Details
of the UDRP, namely: (i)the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights...
2003-08-11 - Case Details
reply to Complainant's contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has shown to the satisfaction of the Panel...
2017-01-03 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the Respondent lacks rights or a legitimate interest in the domain name, and that the...
2015-10-15 - Case Details
been necessary, the Panel would have concluded that the Domain Name was for the purposes of the Policy confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the...
2015-12-10 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights in the mark DELTA SONIC by virtue of its continuous use of the mark in US interstate commerce...
2015-12-07 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant asserts rights in the CASHIES trade mark and alleges that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the...
2015-03-02 - Case Details
confusingly similar. 2. The Complainant has never authorized the Respondent to use its marks, and the Respondent has never been commonly known by any phrase...
2014-06-25 - Case Details
and changing the plural to the singular, and is therefore confusingly similar. 2. The following is the Complainant's argument in full under paragraph 4...
2014-06-25 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s RIMMEL marks, and the Complainant’s evidence demonstrates beyond...
2014-01-30 - Case Details
Panel decides not to accept the Supplemental Fillings submitted by the Complainant. D. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant is the holder of...
2013-06-07 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy must be proven. Since paragraph 4(a)(i) requires Complainant to prove that the disputed domain name “is identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights,” and such rights have not been proven here, the Panel need not address any...
2012-11-09 - Case Details
the website at the disputed domain name. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Second Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a registered...
2016-06-21 - Case Details
(EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly...similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or Community law. - The...
2018-08-10 - Case Details