Panel’s consideration of RDNH. The content of the supplemental filing in set out in section 3 above. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is not in...
2018-08-03 - Case Details
Panel finds that: The disputed domain names and are identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or...
2018-03-02 - Case Details
Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect...
2018-11-15 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or...
2018-09-27 - Case Details
finds that: - The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established...
2018-09-17 - Case Details
finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s company name FIMIPAR protected in France; the Respondent has no rights or...
2021-04-29 - Case Details
11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: - the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which...
2019-01-23 - Case Details
present. 11.2 Domain Names identical or confusingly similar to Complainant�s Marks The domain name in dispute is videonet.com. The Mark owned by the...
2000-07-25 - Case Details
the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, 2)that the Respondent has no...
2000-08-01 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. That the Respondent has no legitimate interests in...
2000-08-29 - Case Details
or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and - that the respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2000-10-13 - Case Details
confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark "JAL". 5.3 The Respondents have no right or legitimate interest in the domain name. In this respect, the...
2000-09-04 - Case Details
not file a Response to the Complaint. 6. Discussion and Findings Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Name 6.1. In relation to the domain name...
2000-10-24 - Case Details
confusingly similar to Complainant�s FLUMINENSE mark, because: Being the Complainant the title holder of the mark "FLUMINENSE", registered in Brazil, in...
2000-10-26 - Case Details
Complainant must prove the presence of each of the following elements: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar...
2000-10-18 - Case Details
Those requirements are that: (i) Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2002-03-19 - Case Details
substantially identical or confusingly similar to "ABEBOOKS.COM" in which the Complainant has established rights in Australia and internationally well before any...
2003-11-17 - Case Details
paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. 6.2 Domain name identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants� Marks The domain name in dispute is " bettinaliano.com...
2000-10-24 - Case Details
the Complaint. 6. Discussion and Findings Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Names 6.1. In relation to both of the domain names "harveynorman.net...
2000-09-27 - Case Details
of goods or services quite different from those in relation to which the Complainant�s trademark is registered. Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain...
2000-09-28 - Case Details