confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark. A detailed analysis of the Canadian case law on confusion in the trademark context is set out in the...
2001-07-31 - Case Details
elements are that: (i) Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and...
2001-07-25 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings Domain Name is Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant�s Mark 6.1. In relation to the domain name , the relevant part of this...
2001-09-10 - Case Details
Respondent to have registered the domain name in bad faith. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant has filed a trade mark...
2020-08-18 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns European trade mark registration 7070485 for BOSTA which the Panel notes was filed on July 9...
2020-08-07 - Case Details
Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly...similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law. The...
2021-04-01 - Case Details
11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a...
2021-03-31 - Case Details
finds that: The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law...
2021-01-29 - Case Details
against Mr. Wasserman from the Court. 7. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The domain name is identical to the term SEASONAL...
2021-01-15 - Case Details
the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks COLAS RAIL and COLAS; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2020-12-02 - Case Details
iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or...
2020-10-22 - Case Details
The “secret soap” element is easily recognizable in the disputed domain name. Consequently, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the...
2022-01-31 - Case Details
name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State...
2021-07-09 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns Australian trade mark registration 1898976 for AFFIRM registered from August 1, 2018...
2021-06-11 - Case Details
that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark KPMG registered in the European Union; the Respondent has no rights...
2020-05-12 - Case Details
of cybersquatting – that is, the registration of domain names consisting of, including, or confusingly similar to marks belonging to another for the...
2008-05-07 - Case Details
since 1999. The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s name and confusingly similar to other marks it owns because the domain name’s...
2008-04-10 - Case Details
name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. The addition of another letter “N” does not change the way in which the word is pronounced...
2006-02-14 - Case Details
round of submissions. The Panel will therefore proceed to a decision based on the Complaint and the Response. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Several...
2005-10-28 - Case Details
finding that the Domain Name of the Respondent has to be transferred to the Complainant: (i) the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2005-04-15 - Case Details