confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademark registration for RECORDATI. Complaint: (ii) The Complainant submits that the Respondent has no rights or...
2000-07-24 - Case Details
provides that the Complainant must prove each of the following: h that the Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2000-05-23 - Case Details
that General Motors must prove, with respect to the domain name in issue, each of the following: (i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly...similar to General Motor�s mark in issue here, and (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name, and (iii) The domain...
2000-10-27 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The indication “.tv” officially designates a domain name registered in the country code top level...
2004-09-01 - Case Details
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. The respondent’s second level domain name ist...
2000-07-20 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2000-12-22 - Case Details
the Complainant must prove that (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has...
2001-01-16 - Case Details
must prove each of the following in order to succeed in an administrative proceeding: - that the Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly...similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and - that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...
2003-05-07 - Case Details
not resolve to any websites. The Complainant says that the Disputed Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to the SEMINOLE CASINO trademarks...
2019-10-29 - Case Details
confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law...
2021-06-29 - Case Details
i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: 6. The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the name in respect of which a...
2020-05-11 - Case Details
Respondent a competitor of Complainant. Use of a confusingly similar domain name to sell goods competitive with those of the mark owner is further evidence in...
2007-11-21 - Case Details
statement. The Complaint Turning now to the substance of the Complaint: A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has provided extensive evidence of...
2009-12-07 - Case Details
Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; - That the Respondent has no legitimate...affects these proceedings." To similar effect is the decision in AT & T Corp v. W.N.A . (with various aliases) ( WIPO Case No. D2001-1160 ). In that case a...
2002-06-14 - Case Details
is confusingly similar to marks of Complainant, since the Panel has determined that the Complaint fails on other grounds, as elaborated below .") Falta...
2015-08-03 - Case Details
confusingly similar. A domain name registrant may, for example, have good cause for believing that the earlier trademark registration is invalid or was itself...
2016-05-06 - Case Details
，“Consensus view: A domain name which contains a common or obvious misspelling of a trademark normally will be found to be confusingly similar to such trademark...
2016-03-21 - Case Details
confusingly similar to marks belonging to another for the purpose of profiting from the goodwill associated with the mark”. 5 En INTOCAST AG v. LEE DAEYOON...
2012-11-06 - Case Details
owns have not been offered for sale to anyone. 6. Discussion and Findings Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to Complainant�s Mark 6.1 The...
2000-07-25 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and, (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...
2000-11-29 - Case Details