About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.245 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50621 - 50640  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1558 for globofm.com html (34 KB)

therefore confusingly similar, to Complainant�s respective GLOBO FM mark, in appearance, pronunciation and sound. That the addition of ".com" to the domain...of the following elements: (i) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...

2001-03-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1047 for fluor.mobi html (33 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has...“Respondent” used in the rest of this decision should be understood accordingly. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.4 The Complainant is clearly the owner of...

2013-07-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0693 for sutherlandinstitute.com html (43 KB)

the existence of a domain name confusingly similar to Sutherland Institute's trademark. Sutherland Institute is especially concerned about this possible...domain name registration and use, and to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...

2009-07-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0649 for orangetogo.com html (41 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect...of the domain name; and (iii) the respondent's domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...

2009-07-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0499 for picknpay.net html (44 KB)

incorporates the Complainant's PICK ‘N PAY mark. In the circumstances it contends that the Domain Name is identical, alternatively, confusingly similar, to the...identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no...

2009-06-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0216 for stonepanel.com html (38 KB)

“requires no skilled labor, with no wasted material.” i. Confusingly Similar to a Trademark in which Complainant has Rights In addition to referring to the...(1) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (2) Respondent has no...

2009-05-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1650 for scarlettjohansson.com html (46 KB)

complainant has the burden of proving the following: (i) That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...applicable”. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant relies upon claimed rights in her personal name, Scarlett Johansson. There is no registered...

2008-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0049 for animalsforadvertising.com html (42 KB)

the extent necessary. A. Complainant (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar First, the Complainant asserts that, as a consequence of its continuous prior...Confusingly Similar The Respondent counters the Complainant’s contention by asserting that, for principally two reasons, the Complainant has no common law...

2007-04-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1537 for image3d.net html (42 KB)

paragraph 4(a) of the Policy. Namely the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark...”. 7.4 The Panel will consider each of these requirements in turn. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.5 This primary trade mark that the Complainant...

2008-12-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0072 for rolyn.com html (39 KB)

provider, in compliance with the Rules, that: “(i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...admit the Supplemental Filings. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds the disputed domain name , disregarding the gTLD “.com”, to be...

2018-04-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2019-0033 for vitogaz.co html (38 KB)

Namely, the Complainant must prove that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant...Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.28 The Panel accepts that the Complainant is the owner of various registered trade marks including the registered word...

2019-11-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0860 for hispaniconline.com, hispaniconline.net html (41 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s said registered service mark . With regard to the Respondent�s rights or legitimate interest in the said...registered the domain names and which are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark and service mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the...

2001-01-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0404 for proquis.com html (54 KB)

the complainant must prove each of the following: - The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the...Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. Accordingly, the Complainant has...

2002-09-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0461 for corinthians.com html (65 KB)

confusingly similar. At no time has Corinthians licensed or otherwise permitted Respondents to use any of their marks or to apply for or use any domain names...finds that the domain name "corinthians.com" is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant�s trademarks. 6.3 Rights and Legitimate Interests in...

2000-07-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0994 for fashiontv.com html (50 KB)

’ Contentions A. Complainant 6.1 The Complainant contends as follows: Identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights 6.2 The Complainant...set out in the Rules. A . Identical or Confusingly Similar 7.3 Under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, the Complainant must show that the Domain Name is...

2005-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1577 for arundel-mills.com, arundelmills.com, arundelmillsblvd.com html (77 KB)

Paragraph 4.(a) are met because: 1. the three domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Mills has rights; 2. Mills has no...MILLS service mark, and why is confusingly similar to the mark. Mills cites WIPO Case No D2000-0038, Case No. AF-0145 [sic], WIPO Case No. D2000-0452...

2001-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1758 for visitqatar.com html (104 KB)

Qatar” and the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to those terms; that the Respondent lacks any legitimate interests in those terms...Disputed Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) the Respondent has no...

2019-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1490 for creo-scitex.com html (65 KB)

contends that the domain name in issue is confusingly similar to Complainant�s trade name CREOSCITEX and marks CREO, CREOSCITEX and SCITEX, and is identical...issue was confusingly similar to the complainant�s trademark registration, that the respondent had no right or legitimate interest in the domain name, and...

2001-01-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1044 for adbankers.com html (47 KB)

confusingly similar to those marks. 5.2 The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name contending that...Complainant has the burden of proof of showing the following: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...

2010-10-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0032 for christinadior.com html (46 KB)

confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (paragraph 4(a)(i)); and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate...submission. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar 6.17 This issue is straightforward. The Domain Name can only sensibly be understood as the name “Christina Dior...

2009-03-18 - Case Details