About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.236 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50681 - 50700  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-1073 for gloriafeldt.com html (29 KB)

the Complainant must prove each of the following: (1) that the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a...Panel has accepted and considered that submission as well. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainants nowhere allege that anyone other than...

2003-03-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0067 for perfetti.net html (28 KB)

prove each of the following: (i) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service in...Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. 6.1. Domain name identical or confusingly similar The Complainant has provided ample and...

2003-04-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0164 for embratel.com html (29 KB)

Contentions 5. 1 Complainant contends that: a) The domain name is identical, and therefore confusingly similar to the trademark EMBRATEL, because: i) The...other word or phrase similar to or including "embratel". Beside alleging that he acted in the past as an "small I.S.P." the Respondent does not give to...

2000-05-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0543 for ticocarros.com html (31 KB)

consisting of, including, or confusingly similar to marks belonging to another for the purpose of profiting from the goodwill associated with the mark ”. Véase...similar, ni ante una actividad comercial real y efectiva por lo que el Demandante considera que se está ante una simulación de derechos y falta de interés...

2011-06-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0489 for pagesjaunes.com, pagesjaunes.net html (12 KB)

These elements are that: (i) Respondent's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has...

2000-08-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1588 for orgatech.com html (13 KB)

domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) the respondent has no rights...

2001-01-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1542 for ac-alternative.com html (13 KB)

English and Spanish languages. Accordingly, the Panel finds that English is the proper language of the proceedings. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...

2011-11-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCC2011-0006 for ibm.cc html (12 KB)

Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The test of identity...

2012-01-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1397 for kravetfurniture.com html (14 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established that it has rights in the trademarks KRAVET and KRAVET FURNITURE. The test for confusing...

2017-09-05 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0692 for yit.biz, yit.info html (14 KB)

prove that each of the following three elements are present: (i) the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...

2007-07-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-1479 for arkema.tech html (14 KB)

available. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Once the gTLD “.tech” is ignored (which is appropriate in this case), the disputed...

2021-08-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0788 for pottarybarn.com, pottreybarn.com, pottrybarn.com html (13 KB)

confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) That the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in...

2003-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0523 for rymanauditorium.com html (149 KB)

representing a considerable profit over their direct costs of registration”).   5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant (i) Identical or Confusingly Similar The...Complainant argues that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its registered trademarks and service marks, which Gaylord maintains, are now...

2006-09-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0148 for engineer.biz, engineer.info html (20 KB)

content that is generated by common computer programs.   6. Discussion and Findings Rights in a Mark ; Identical or Confusingly Similar For Complainant to...intentional copying (as Complainant alleges) or innocently from both parties’ use of similar computer language for similar subjects (as Respondent alleges)? To...

2007-04-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1826 for woolworthscloud.com html (14 KB)

services purpose for the disputed domain name. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name incorporates the...

2011-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-2705 for alstom.one pdf (157 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing (or threshold) test...

2024-08-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0299 for montyroberts.net html (51 KB)

elements are that: (i) Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and..."montyroberts.net" is without doubt confusingly similar to Complainant�s service mark "Monty Roberts". Complainant has met the burden of proving that Respondent is...

2000-06-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0300 for montyroberts.org html (55 KB)

to obtain relief. These elements are that: (i) Respondent�s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...is without doubt confusingly similar to Complainant�s service mark "Monty Roberts". Complainant has met the burden of proving that Respondent is the...

2000-06-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-4256 for reimex.com html (50 KB)

Confusingly Similar The Complainant indisputably has rights in the REIMEX mark as a result of his trademark registrations and his use of this mark on the market...domain name, the domain name will normally be considered identical or confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy. Furthermore, the...

2022-03-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0282 for pokerfriends.com html (50 KB)

Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar 5.A.1 The Complainant is the owner of the Benelux trademark POKERFRIENDS.COM registered on December 28, 2009. The...or Confusingly Similar 5.B.1 The Respondent says that the identity of the Complainant's registered trademark POKERFRIENDS.COM and the disputed domain...

2010-06-29 - Case Details