About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 51305   document(s)s (0.143 sec)

Rows

<<  <  50821 - 50840  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-2114 for mypremierdeadsea.com html (13 KB)

(i) The disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or a service mark in which the Complainant...

2014-02-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2282 for philipmorris.careers, philipmorris.company html (16 KB)

elements.” Western Research 3000, Inc. v. NEP Products, Inc . WIPO Case No. D2004-0755 (emphasis in original). A. Identical or Confusingly Similar. Each...

2015-03-06 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCH2014-0026 for evasolo.ch html (15 KB)

Name is identical (and/or confusingly similar) to Claimant’s Swiss trademark. The Domain Name entirely incorporates the distinctive sign EVA SOLO held by...

2015-02-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2124 for lloydsbank.scot html (14 KB)

prove all three of the following elements to be entitled to the relief sought: (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a...

2015-02-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2187 for kpmg.nyc html (14 KB)

Domain Name should be cancelled or transferred. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is uncontested that Complainants have established worldwide rights...

2015-02-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2041 for rvk.com html (15 KB)

not to respond. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant's registration of the RVK mark on the USPTO's Principal...

2015-01-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2052 for walmartsaver.com, walmartsaver.net html (15 KB)

of its corporate name in retail commerce. The disputed domain names are thus confusingly similar to a mark in which Complainant has rights. 2...

2015-01-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1901 for wup.com html (13 KB)

be admitted to the record. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a German federal registered trade mark for...

2014-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1755 for roofingbyruff.com, ruffroofing.com html (15 KB)

in this case: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and (ii...

2014-12-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1575 for logickeyboards.com html (15 KB)

identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trade mark; and (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed...

2013-11-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1360 for croma.com html (14 KB)

amounts to a case of reverse domain name hijacking. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has...

2013-09-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1689 for trendyhair.com html (14 KB)

Complainant must prove that each of the following three elements is present: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...

2014-11-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0970 for kingbaby.com html (16 KB)

three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in...

2014-08-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-0936 for insqin.com html (15 KB)

prevail. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark acquired through use and registration. The...

2014-08-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1461 for louenhide.com html (17 KB)

the case on the basis of the most complete available record. B. Identical of Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is identical to the LOUENHIDE...

2011-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0927 for gea.com html (13 KB)

Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated that it owns trade mark rights for the...

2011-08-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1553 for bradescobank.com html (15 KB)

the Respondent’s failure to reply. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has a trademark registration for the mark BRADESCO No. 007170424...

2010-11-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1469 for eccodiscount.com html (12 KB)

of ECCO domain names in which it owns rights. The Complainant contends that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to its ECCO trade mark and...

2010-11-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2010-0012 for ministryofwaxing.co html (14 KB)

globally comprehensive trademark.” 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant is the registered owner of two European...

2010-11-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0472 for rock-wool.net html (14 KB)

Complainant The Complainant contended that the disputed domain name was identical or confusingly similar to its registered trademark ROCKWOOL; that the...

2012-05-18 - Case Details