attempt to sell the disputed domain name to third parties. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated...
2017-09-05 - Case Details
by the Panel’s determination that English is to be the language of the proceeding. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established...
2016-04-13 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has established it has rights in the trade mark BAYER. The mark has been incorporated in its entirety...
2016-01-05 - Case Details
determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is well accepted...
2024-05-03 - Case Details
Response the Panelist has exercised its discretion and decided not to admit this Supplemental Filing. Identical or confusingly similar Based on the evidence...
2009-05-18 - Case Details
Complainant to demonstrate that: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights...
2009-03-17 - Case Details
that the proceeding should continue and a decision issued within the given term. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar In the...
2009-02-27 - Case Details
That the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) That the...in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any Rules and principles of law that it deems applicable. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2009-02-10 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to his professional name “John Bowers QC”. The Complainant alleges that...
2009-01-14 - Case Details
Identical or Confusingly Similar Even though more relevant under the second and third element of the UDRP, the Panel notes that the registration of the...
2008-04-01 - Case Details
Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name fully...
2008-02-15 - Case Details
Respondent indicated that it would not be willing to sell the Domain Name for less than $5,000. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant asserts that the...respondent’s domain name: (i) that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; (ii...
2008-02-07 - Case Details
Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar. The determination of whether a Complainant has rights in a mark sufficient to invoke the Policy under paragraph...
2007-12-07 - Case Details
primarily to male enhancement-related products. See Reply, Exhibit A. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that...
2007-11-02 - Case Details
each of the following: (a) that the Domain Name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service in which the...
2006-08-24 - Case Details
5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its trademark registrations...
2006-06-21 - Case Details
and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain names are and and the Complainant's trademark is ERIS UN. The disputed domain names...
2008-08-27 - Case Details
Respondent The Respondent did not formally reply to the Complainant's contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The...
2008-08-19 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant has established its rights in the trademark YEM KITABEVI with logo, in Turkey, by enclosing the trademark certificate issued...
2007-02-26 - Case Details
respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) respondent has no...
2007-06-29 - Case Details