following, namely that: (i) The Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii...litigation takes. Instead, the Panel believes that it will be more appropriate to follow the course taken in a number of similar cases, namely to terminate...
2015-01-21 - Case Details
confusingly similar to its registered trademark BACCARAT; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name as there is no...Procedural Order (the “Panel Order”). The Panel Order was similar to that that issued in RapidShare AG, Christian Schmid v. PrivacyAnywhere Software, LLC...
2013-07-19 - Case Details
but argues that the Respondent should not be permitted to use any form of his name that is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. This is little...Centro en Ken’s Foods Inc. v. kens.com , Caso OMPI No. D2005-0721 , al resolver un caso muy similar al presente: “The primary rule in relation to domain...
2011-08-30 - Case Details
accepted practice under the Policy) that the disputed domain names were confusingly similar to those proven trademarks. The Complainant’s successful...names. The Respondents also offer the same or similar services from the disputed domain name, . The disputed domain name, , redirects to the Respondents...
2012-02-15 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar. Complainant has demonstrated rights in its BUDGE marks, and “Budge” is the dominant feature of both the disputed domain names. The addition...similar reasons Complainant has proven bad faith in registration and use. Respondent sold Complainant's branded products and thus can hardly deny awareness...
2010-04-30 - Case Details
proof in respect of the following three elements: (i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the...this case. Such conduct deserves the limited censure available to the Panel under the Policy and the Rules, if only to deter similar conduct in future. I...
2010-08-03 - Case Details
Complainant's contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the Complainant has demonstrated that it has...offering of goods or services and his clear pattern of conduct is only reinforced by his use of domain names such as which is very similar to the “ingame...
2009-11-06 - Case Details
abusive cybersquatting. To invoke the Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which...la demanda contenidos en el párrafo 4.a) de la Política son: - que el nombre de dominio sea idéntico o similar hasta el punto de crear confusión, con...
2009-10-07 - Case Details
name to Complainant. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar. Respondent raises one serious issue under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the...v. Grantics , WIPO Case No. D2000-1269 , cited in the Complaint. The basic factual pattern is similar: complainant held exclusive rights to make a...
2011-06-08 - Case Details
administrative proceeding – Respondent’s entitlement (or not) to the disputed domain name. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar Similarity is obvious, as the...Dispute Policy in effect at the time of the dispute.” Arbitration or similar agreements are perfectly legal in Texas, 2 even in contracts of adhesion, 3 and...
2011-06-07 - Case Details
now proceeds to address the Complaint and Response as follows. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant asserts that...mark rights the Panel accepts that Complainant’s Trade Mark is identified with Complainant and that an unrelated entity or person using a similar domain...
2015-07-08 - Case Details
confusingly similar, or otherwise wholly incorporates the relevant trademark” should apply to this case. Ibid . 3. The Complainant cites cases 4 that it claims...names and is thus obviously confusing similar. The mark is distinctive and the Respondent, a former employee, selected the disputed domain name for its...
2015-04-23 - Case Details
trademark owners. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated longstanding use and registration of the...hold: any person may indeed be free to compile a directory of domain names, or telephones or addresses or similar, but need not for that purpose actually...
2015-09-04 - Case Details
Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the...estimación de una demanda contenidos en el artículo 4.a) de la Política son: - que el nombre de dominio sea idéntico o similar hasta el punto de crear...
2015-07-29 - Case Details
The reasons for this conclusion are articulated below. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar As noted above, Complainant asserts that it has been in...valuable common female first name, similar to hundreds of other domain names it has registered, and it has used the Domain Name both in connection with the...
2016-06-23 - Case Details
even if it had admitted both filings. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar It is not in dispute that the Complainant has acquired rights in the mark MEZ...and that the disputed domain name is part of a pattern of similar three-letter domain names owned by it. The Panel therefore concludes the Complainant...
2017-01-13 - Case Details
Respondent's supplemental filing because it does not add anything material to the Respondent's extensive primary submission. B. Identical or Confusingly Similar...Complainant's trade mark. The Respondent has sold similar brand-able domain names in the past. The Complainant has failed in its burden to establish that the...
2016-11-28 - Case Details
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain names are identical to the Complainant's prior Trade Marks. The gTLD ".xyz" does not serve to...affected the complainants' individual rights in a similar fashion; (ii) it would be equitable and procedurally efficient to permit the consolidation; or in...
2016-11-22 - Case Details
domain name hijacking. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has demonstrated common law rights in its GRANDSTAND brand sufficient to invoke...proven, not simply alleged. Similar allegations in the Complaint may be similarly described and are similarly discounted by the Panel. The Complainant's...
2017-10-24 - Case Details
filing would have made no difference to the outcome of this case. C. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has rights in the mark YNAP by virtue...Rules are very similar to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) and the UDRP Rules. Accordingly, the Panel refers below to UDRP cases...
2017-07-31 - Case Details